Assessment of Planting Method and Deficit Irrigation Impacts on Physio-Morphology, Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Maize (Zea mays L.) on Vertisols of Semi-Arid Tropics
Halli, Hanamant M. | Angadi, Sanganabasappa | Aravind Kumar, | Govindasamy, Prabhu | Madar, Raghavendra | Baskar V, David Chella | Elansary, Hosam O. | Tamam, Nissren | Abdelbacki, Ashraf M. M. | Abdelmohsen, Shaimaa A. M.
Agriculture in a water-limited environment is critically important for today and for the future. This research evaluates the impact of deficit irrigation in different planting methods on the physio-morphological traits, grain yield and WUE of maize (Zea mays L.). The experiment was carried out in 2015 and 2016, consisting of three planting methods (i.e., BBF, SNF, and DWF) and four irrigation levels (i.e., I₁₀D: irrigation once in ten days, I₄₀: irrigation at 40% DASM, I₅₀: irrigation at 50% DASM, and I₆₀: irrigation at 60% DASM). The results reveal that varying degrees of water stress due to planting methods and irrigation levels greatly influenced the maize physio-morphological traits and yield attributes. The combined effect of DWF + I₅₀ benefited the maize in terms of higher leaf area, RWC, SPAD values, CGR, and LAD, followed by the SNF method at 60 DAS. As a result, DWF + I₅₀ and SNF + I₅₀ had higher 100 grain weight (30.5 to 31.8 g), cob weight (181.4 to 189.6 g cob⁻¹) and grain yield (35.3% to 36.4%) compared to other treatments. However, the reduction in the number of irrigations (24.0%) under SNF + I₅₀ resulted in a 34% water saving. Thus, under a water-limited situation in semi-arid tropics, the practice of the SNF method + I₅₀ could be an alternative way to explore the physio-morphological benefits in maize.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил National Agricultural Library