Evaluation of bioscrubber and biofilter technologies treating wastewater foul air by a new approach of using odor character, odor intensity, and chemical analyses

The treatment of raw foul air that could escape to the atmosphere from the head space of the incoming wastewater into a Southern California Water Resource Recovery Facility was evaluated by using a 1/20th scale pilot unit consisting of five different biological media technologies, operating side by side, under different operating conditions. The removal of six different odor characters from eight chemical odorants present in the foul air were assessed. These were rotten egg (Hydrogen Sulfide), rotten vegetables (Methyl Mercaptan), canned corn (Dimethyl Sulfide), rotten garlic (Dimethyl Disulfide), earthy/musty (2-Methyl Isoborneol and 2-Isopropyl 3-Methyl Pyrazine) and fecal (Skatole and Indole). This is the first time a study evaluates specific odors by simultaneously employing sensory analyses using the Odor Profile Method, which defines the different odor characters and intensities, together with chemical analyses of the compounds causing these odors, known as odorants. The paper discusses the efficiencies in removing odor characters as well as odorants by two different bioscrubbers (reticulated polyurethane cube foam and polypropylene mesh with layered polyester foam) and three different biofilters (engineered media, seashells, and lava rock). The results show that the two bioscrubbers, even with greater empty bed gas retention times, did not provide significant improvement in odor intensity and odorant removal. However, the biofilters showed that larger empty bed gas retention times provided significant improvements in diminishing the odor intensities and better odorant removal. The biofilter with lava rock media at 45 s empty bed gas retention time provided the best treatment among the technologies tested, achieving the following odorant reductions: 99.8% for hydrogen sulfide, 98.4% for methyl mercaptan, 57.0% for dimethyl sulfide, and 52.7 for dimethyl disulfide. This biofilter also achieved the following odor intensity reductions: 47% for rotten vegetable odors, 50% for earthy/musty odors, and 100% for fecal odors. The odor panel detected odors by the Odor Profile Method that were below the detection limit of the corresponding chemical analytical method for specific chemical compounds causing these odors. Differences were observed between the performances of bioscrubbers and biofilters, based on odorant removal compared to those based on sensorial analyses, indicating that both analyses are required to understand more fully the odor dynamics. Furthermore, a total odor removal of 99.2% was observed by the dilution to threshold olfactometer method even though nearly half of the rotten vegetable and earthy/musty odors remained based upon the Odor Profile Method. This shows the olfactometer method did not correctly define the degree of odor nuisance in the foul air in this study. Bioscrubbers have in general a better economic return when used at low EBGRTs and as preliminary (first stage) treatment systems. Biofilters are more effective when used at high EBGRTs and can be used as stand-alone or polishing systems.