Temporal expression pattern of steroid-metabolizing enzymes in bovine COC during in vitro maturation employing different gonadotropin concentrations

Steroid hormones are regulators in the fine-tuned process of follicular development. During final maturation in vivo a switch from oestradiol (E2) to progesterone (P4) dominance within the follicle is well-described. This change is accompanied by the resumption of meiosis and results in the maturation of the oocyte. It also suggests the important role of these hormones. However, present in vitro maturation (IVM) systems do not completely mimic the in vivo situation, resulting in oocytes of reduced quality. Aim of the study was to determine the temporal pattern of steroid hormone concentrations in the IVM medium of bovine cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COC) at defined time points. The influence of different gonadotropin supplementations during IVM on oocyte maturation, as well as the molecular quality of the oocytes and their corresponding cumulus cells was investigated. COCs were obtained from abattoir-derived ovaries and matured in medium added with different compounds of gonadotropins (eCG/hCG; FSH/LH, each at 0.05 IU or 0.01 IU; only FSH; without gonadotropins) employing a standard protocol without oil overlay. In experiment 1, medium, oocytes and cumulus cells were collected at different time points (0 h [control], 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 20 h, 24 h) after IVM in just eCG/hCG-supplemented medium. In experiment 2, medium, oocytes and cumulus cells were collected at 0 h (control) and after 24 h of IVM with all above-named supplements. The E2 concentration remained similar during IVM whereas P4 concentration increased during experiment 1. No significant changes could be determined after the addition of different gonadotropins (experiment 2). These results suggest that during IVM the temporal pattern of E2 and P4 did not correspond with the pattern during final maturation in vivo. RT-qPCR was used to assess the relative abundance of developmentally important genes in oocytes (BMP15; GDF9; ZAR1; PGR; PGRMC1/2; G6PD; StAR; ESR1/2; SULT1E1; STS; SOAT) and cumulus cells (ESR1/2; FSHR; LHCGR; CYP19A1; HSD3B1; PGR; PGRMC1/2; SULT1E1; STS; SOAT) at all collection points in both experiments. Most transcripts follow a time-regulated mRNA expression pattern during the entire in vitro maturation period. In addition, the expression of the analyzed transcripts was not influenced by the different gonadotropin supplementations during the IVM period. In all, this underlines that present conditions of IVM do not reflect the in vivo situation and require further optimisation.