Comparison of Four Methods for Forage Nitrate Analysis
1995
Bedwell, Cathy L. | Hamar, Dwayne W. | Hoesterey, Martha L. | Sonderman, John P. | Odde, Kenneth G.
Twenty forage samples were collected and selected for variation in nitrate content. Each forage sample was analyzed 4 times by 4 different methods: diphenylamine spot plate, spectrophotometric, nitrate-selective electrode, and high-performance liquid chromatographic. Five feed extracts were spiked with 2 different amounts of nitrate and analyzed by each method. The spectrophotometric and nitrate-selective electrode had similar percent recoveries, which were close to 100%. The nitrate-selective electrode method had the least variation of the 4 methods. The diphenylamine spot plate method had the poorest average recovery, greatest variation, and was the least accurate. The average coefficients of variation for all samples within a method were 15%, 12%, 6.4%, and 16% for the diphenylamine spot plate, spectrophotometric, nitrate-selective electrode, and high-performance liquid chromatographic methods, respectively. The variation in the nitrate-selective electrode method was lower (P < 0.05) than the other methods. The results from this study suggest that the nitrate-selective electrode method is more accurate and precise than the other methods of analysis tested.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил National Agricultural Library