Soil degradation by Erosion of a typic hapludalf in central Ohio and its rehabilitation

Soil erosion and runoff were monitored from 1988 to 1990 on a Miamian soil (Typic Hapludalf) of 5‐6 per cent slope using field runoff plots. Four treatments were studied: (i) disk‐plough up and down the slope to 0.3 m depth (DP); (ii) disk‐plough up and down the slope followed by a protective netting (PN); (iii) uncultivated fallow without any vegetation followed by surface soil removal (R); (iv) uncultivated fallow with natural vegetation followed by ploughing (F). Mean annual runoff losses were 6, 114 and 128 mm, or 4, 20 and 18 per cent of the rainfall, and mean annual soil losses were 1.2, 85.0 and 64.0 Mg ha⁻¹ in 1988, 1989 and 1990, respectively. Mean runoff amounts were 26, 69, 116 and 118mm and mean annual soil losses were 0.4, 23.2, 58.6 and 118 Mg ha⁻¹ for the F, PN, DP and R treatments, respectively. In comparison with DP, PN decreased annual runoff by 40.3 per cent and annual soil loss by 79.5 per cent. The high mean soil loss for the R treatment was due to erosion following soil removal. An additional 2920 Mg ha⁻¹ of surface soil was removed from the R treatment in May 1990. The F treatment reduced runoff by 78, 77 and 62 per cent and reduced soil loss by 99.7, 99.4 and 98.4 per cent compared with the R, DP and PN treatments, respectively. Mean losses of K, Ca, Mg and P were 1.3, 4, 1 and 01 kg ha⁻¹, respectively for F, 3, 16, 5 and 0.3kg ha⁻¹, respectively, for PN, 5, 31, 1 and 0.6kg ha⁻¹, respectively, for DP, and 3, 32, 12 and 0.4 kg ha⁻¹, respectively, for R. Soil and nutrient losses for each treatment were in the order R > DP > PN > F. The soil organic carbon (SOC) content was significantly affected by soil erosion and management treatments, and ranged from 0.98 per cent for the R treatment to 2.3 per cent for the F treatment. Soil surface removal for the R treatment in 1990 reduced water‐stable aggregates (WSA) by 9.0 per cent, SOC by 0.6 per cent, and clay content of the uppermost 0‐50 mm depth by about 7.0 per cent. Mean total porosity (fₜ) ranged from 0.43 for the F to 0.52 for the DP treatment. Cumulative infiltration for 3h ranged from 13 cm for R to 34cm for PN, with corresponding infiltration rates of 4 cm h⁻¹ and 13 cm h⁻¹, respectively. Regardless of the treatment, there were also temporal changes in soil properties. In comparison with 1988, measurements made in 1990 showed a significant decrease in WSA of 21.3 per cent, an increase in clay content of 2.8 per cent, and a decrease in SOC of 0.39 per cent. Runoff and soil losses were significantly correlated with the mean weight diameter (MWD), SOC, bulk density (pb) and available water capacity (AWC). Plant height measured 8 weeks after planting (WAP) for the R treatment was reduced by 33.3 per cent, 33.0 per cent and 29.0 per cent compared withh DP, PN and F, respectively. Nitrogen uptake by maize plants (Zea mays L.) 10 WAP for the R treatment was lower by 15 per cent, 8 per cent, and 6 per cent compared with the DP, PN and F treatments, respectively, while P uptake was lower by 33 per cent, 32 per cent and 29 per cent, respectively, compared with the same treatments. Grain yield was 9.78 Mg ha⁻¹ for PN, 9.76 Mg ha⁻¹ for DP, 8.64 Mg ha⁻¹ for F and 6.60 Mg ha⁻¹ for R during the 1990 crop season. Grain yield was reduced by about 32.4 per cent in the R treatment compared with the PN treatment, representing a maize grain yield reduction of 158 kg ha⁻¹ for each centimeter of soil lost.