Understanding the perceptions of Chinese women of the commercially available domestic and imported HPV vaccine: A semantic network analysis

A domestic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Cecolin, that protects against HPV strains 16 and 18 was introduced to the Chinese market at a relatively low price in May 2020.This study has explored Chinese women’s perceptions of both domestic and imported HPV vaccines, which differ in price and valency.Sentiment analysis and semantic network analyses were performed based on a sample of 45,729 domestic HPV vaccine-related posts from females on the Sina Weibo between April 17 and May 2, 2020. The geographic distribution was also analyzed based on the users’ locations, which were retrieved from the database.Most of the posts were positive and neutral (85%), although 15% were negative (e.g., expressions of anger, sadness, fear and disgust). Semantic analyses of the negative posts revealed that Chinese women generally had positive attitudes towards the HPV vaccine and were willing to be vaccinated. However, obvious geographical variations were identified. Women who lived in economically developed areas expressed a stronger desire to obtain imported quadrivalent or nonavalent vaccines due to concerns regarding effectiveness and quality. The women expressed disgust and anger mainly regarding difficulties in making an appointment, age restrictions for the nonavalent vaccine and gender restrictions. However, the population targeted by the domestic vaccine, namely women who lived in economically undeveloped areas and had relatively low incomes, had a low awareness of the HPV vaccine.Government should provide programs, which educate females that bivalent HPV vaccine can offer protection against the majority of high-risk HPV types. Increasing awareness of the domestic vaccine among the population in economically undeveloped areas and provision of free domestic bivalent HPV vaccination/screening for low-income high-risk women would help to prevent cervical carcinoma. This issue also depends on rebuilding trust and repairing damage to the relationship between government/domestic vaccine manufacturers and the public.