Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review
Mie, Axel | Andersen, Helle Raun | Gunnarsson, Stefan | Kahl, Johannes | Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle | Rembialkowska, Ewa | Quaglio, Gianluca | Grandjean, Philippe | Department of Clinical Science and Education ; Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm] | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (SLU) | University of Southern Denmark (SDU) | Department of Animal Environment and Health ; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (SLU) | Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports [Copenhagen] ; Faculty of Science [Copenhagen] ; University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH)-University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH) | Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS (U1153 / UMR_A_1125 / UMR_S_1153)) ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) | Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW) | European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ; Partenaires INRAE | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health | The Science and Technology Options Assessment Panel of the European Parliament
International audience
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Английский. This review summarises existing evidence on the impact of organic food on human health. It compares organic vs. conventional food production with respect to parameters important to human health and discusses the potential impact of organic management practices with an emphasis on EU conditions. Organic food consumption may reduce the risk of allergic disease and of overweight and obesity, but the evidence is not conclusive due to likely residual confounding, as consumers of organic food tend to have healthier lifestyles overall. However, animal experiments suggest that identically composed feed from organic or conventional production impacts in different ways on growth and development. In organic agriculture, the use of pesticides is restricted, while residues in conventional fruits and vegetables constitute the main source of human pesticide exposures. Epidemiological studies have reported adverse effects of certain pesticides on children's cognitive development at current levels of exposure, but these data have so far not been applied in formal risk assessments of individual pesticides. Differences in the composition between organic and conventional crops are limited, such as a modestly higher content of phenolic compounds in organic fruit and vegetables, and likely also a lower content of cadmium in organic cereal crops. Organic dairy products, and perhaps also meats, have a higher content of omega-3 fatty acids compared to conventional products. However, these differences are likely of marginal nutritional significance. Of greater concern is the prevalent use of antibiotics in conventional animal production as a key driver of antibiotic resistance in society; antibiotic use is less intensive in organic production. Overall, this review emphasises several documented and likely human health benefits associated with organic food production, and application of such production methods is likely to be beneficial within conventional agriculture, e.g., in integrated pest management.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Institut national de la recherche agronomique