Optimal water resources management: Case of lower Litani River, Lebanon

The pressures of human population and patterns of development frequently jeopardize the integrity of river systems worldwide. An integrated approach to water resources management is essential, particularly in developing countries. This study presents the results of the water resources optimization conducted for the Lower Litani River Basin in Lebanon. The overall aim of the project is to develop, test, and critically evaluate an innovative approach to water resources management in the Mediterranean region. The method explores the ways in which multiple environmental, economic, and social benefits can be achieved through integrated management of water resources. The Water Resources Model was utilized to assess the efficiency of the baseline model scenario and for the optimization process of the different scenarios of the Litani Lower Basin. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was applied in order to derive the objectives and constraints. Results revealed that the potential retained scenarios aim at decreasing water consumption and demand, losses, and return flow. These scenarios mainly include the shift to drip irrigation, awareness campaigns, and losses control in domestic supply pipes. Other retained scenarios having a higher shortfall rely on the use of the Channel concrete lining to decrease losses and return flow, in addition to the awareness campaigns in both domestic and irrigation sectors, and less consumptive-more efficient irrigation methods such as sprinkler and drip irrigation at variable application percentages. Hence, most of the interventions or measures proposed are generally not costly and can be implemented. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008.

AMERY HA, 1993, GEOGR REV, V83, P229, DOI 10.2307-215726; Andrews K. R., 1987, CONCEPT CORPORATE ST; Arslan O, 2008, J HAZARD MATER, V154, P901, DOI 10.1016-j.jhazmat.2007.10.113; Biswas AK, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P5, DOI 10.1080-07900620701871718; Blackmore DJ, 1995, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V32, P15, DOI 10.1016-0273-1223(95)00642-7; Cetinkaya CP, 2008, J HYDROINFORM, V10, P69, DOI 10.2166-hydro.2007.011; *CIPD, 2008, FACT SHEET SWOT AN; Diamantopoulou P, 2008, ENVIRON GEOL, V54, P197, DOI 10.1007-s00254-007-0808-5; *FAO, 1970, LIB ET EAUX SOUT; *FAO, 1994, 594 FAO CPLEB FAO IN; Giordano R, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V84, P213, DOI 10.1016-j.jenvman.2006.05.006; Grobicki AMW, 2001, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V44, P313; Hao XM, 2008, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V22, P1159, DOI 10.1007-s11269-007-9218-4; *IUCN, 2000, VIS WAT NAT WORLD ST, P69; Johnson N., 2002, WATER POLICY, V3, P507; JONCHCLAUSEN T, 2004, INTEGRATED WATER RES, P45; MASSOUD M, 2005, WATER POLICY, V6, P519; Massoud MA, 2003, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V46, P875, DOI 10.1016-S0964-5691(03)00068-1; *MIN ENV LEB ENV D, 2001, SOER STAT ENV REP, P240; *MIN TRAV PUBL TRA, 1969, ATL CLIM LIB; MOSS A, 1997, 14 AM U SCH INT SERV; Mylopoulos Y, 2008, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V22, P1101, DOI 10.1007-s11269-007-9214-8; Okun DA, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V46, P273; Olsson JA, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P97, DOI 10.1007-s11269-006-9043-1; Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P49, DOI 10.1007-s11269-006-9040-4; Richards H, 2001, MODELING DECISION SU; SAATY RW, 1987, MATH MODELLING, V9, P161, DOI 10.1016-0270-0255(87)90473-8; SHIKLOMANOV IA, 1999, SUMMARY MONOGRAPH WO, P51; Shourian M, 2008, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V22, P1347, DOI 10.1007-s11269-007-9229-1; Timmerman JG, 2005, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V5, P162, DOI 10.1007-s10113-004-0090-y; Ujang Z, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V46, P1; *UNDP, 1970, DPSFUN44LEBANON UNDP, P33; Valentin E. K., 2001, J MARKETING THEORY P, V9, P54; Yarrow MM, 2008, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V22, P1531, DOI 10.1007-s11269-008-9241-0

8

8

7