Effect of Feed Additives as Alternatives to In-feed Antimicrobials on Production Performance and Intestinal <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> Counts in Broiler Chickens
Silje Granstad | Anja B. Kristoffersen | Sylvie L. Benestad | Siri K. Sjurseth | Bruce David | Line Sørensen | Arnulf Fjermedal | Dag H. Edvardsen | Gorm Sanson | Atle Løvland | Magne Kaldhusdal
Numerous non-antibiotic feed additives (alternatives to antibiotics, ATAs) have been marketed, but few have been evaluated under uniform testing conditions modelling commercial flocks. We compared 24 ATA treatments and the ionophorous coccidiostat narasin against a diet without any feed additives. Feed conversion ratio and body weight gain were registered from day 0 to 28 in Ross 308 chickens housed on litter floor. The chickens were challenged with <i>Eimeria</i> spp., and cecal <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> (CP) counts were investigated. Active components from all ATA classes had a positive impact on intestinal health or production performance. Whereas narasin had a strong CP-reducing effect in combination with performance-promoting impact, only two ATA treatments achieved significantly beneficial effects on CP counts as well as feed conversion during the time span following <i>Eimeria</i> challenge. Active components present in these two treatments include a <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> probiotic strain, short- and medium-chain fatty acids and <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> components. Different ATA classes had beneficial impact during distinct rearing phases and on specific performance targets, suggesting that optimizing combinations and use of active components can make ATAs even more useful tools in broiler rearing without the use of in-feed antimicrobials. Further studies of promising ATAs and ATA combinations are required.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Directory of Open Access Journals