Peach, Apple, and Pear Fruit Quality: To Peel or Not to Peel?
Michail Michailidis | Evangelos Karagiannis | Elpida Nasiopoulou | Christina Skodra | Athanassios Molassiotis | Georgia Tanou
The nutritional value of the peeled and unpeeled fruit (peel plus flesh tissues) was studied using four peach (<i>Prunus persica</i> L.; Red Heaven, Maria Blanca, Big Top, and Queen Giant), two pear (<i>Pyrus communis</i> L.; Santa Maria, <i>Pyrus pyrifolia</i> N.; Nashi), and three apple (<i>Malus domestica</i> Borkh.; Gala, Granny Smith, and Red Chief) cultivars. Based on principal components analysis (PCA) models, there was a clear differentiation among the cultivars’ and the peeled fruits’ nutritional characteristics in comparison to the unpeeled ones. Increased antioxidant capacity and content of total phenols and flavonoids of peaches (Red Heaven and Maria Blanca) versus nectarines (Big Top and Queen Giant) were recorded. In contrast, nectarines were characterized by higher hydroxycinnamates and dry matter. The apples’ cultivar Granny Smith exhibited a high level of titratable acidity (TA), while the Gala displayed a high level of soluble solids concentration (SSC), carotenoids, dry matter, hydroxycinnamic acids, and flavonols at the unpeeled fruit, whereas the Red Chief by increased anthocyanins, antioxidant capacity, total phenols, and flavonoids. Nashi pears with peel were more beneficial due to the strong skin contribution in the fruits’ beneficial compounds content. The peel of the Granny Smith cultivar was associated with an increased level of P, K, Ca, and Mg, whereas that of Red Chief with increased anthocyanins and Mg content.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Directory of Open Access Journals