Beyond the Black Box of Life Cycle Assessment in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Which Help from Bioassays?
Michele Menghini | Roberta Pedrazzani | Donatella Feretti | Giovanna Mazzoleni | Nathalie Steimberg | Chiara Urani | Ilaria Zerbini | Giorgio Bertanza
The assessment of the environmental footprint of an organization or product is based on methods published by the European Union Joint Research Centre, which take 16 impact areas into account. Among the listed categories are human and freshwater ecosystem toxicities. Standard protocols utilize just chemical parameters as input data, hindering the determination of the full impact of complex mixes, such as pollutants released into the environment. Biological assays enable us to overcome this gap: in the present work, assays were employed to determine both baseline and specific toxicity to aquatic species (green algae, luminescent bacteria, and crustacean cladocera) as well as specific toxicity (mutagenicity and carcinogenicity). Ecological footprint was estimated with regard to the impact categories “freshwater toxicity” and “human cancer toxicity” following the standard methodology. In parallel, the impact on the above categories was estimated using the results of biological assays as input. Standard and bioassay-based results are not always congruent, and conventional methods generally underestimate the effects. Likewise, the choice of reference substance (metals or organics) influences the quantification of impact. Appropriate batteries of biological assays could therefore be utilized to complement LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) techniques in order to make them more sensitive when considering toxicity in mid-term impact categories.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Directory of Open Access Journals