Interest in Humans: Comparisons between Riding School Lesson Equids and Assisted-Intervention Equids
Noémie Lerch | Francesca Cirulli | Céline Rochais | Clémence Lesimple | Estelle Guilbaud | Laura Contalbrigo | Marta Borgi | Marine Grandgeorge | Martine Hausberger
Little is known about the impact of equine-assisted interventions (EAI) on equids’ perception of humans. In this study 172 equids, living in 12 riding centres, were submitted to a standardised human–horse relationship test: the motionless person test. Age, sex, type (horse/pony), housing, and feeding conditions of subjects were recorded. Overall, 17 equids worked in EAI, 95 in riding school lessons (RS), and 60 in both (EAI-RS). There were high inter-individual variations in the number of interactive behaviours directed towards the experimenter: negative binomial general linear models showed that activity was the most important factor: RS equids performed more interactive behaviours than EAI (<i>p</i> = 0.039) and EAI-RS (<i>p</i> < 0.001) equids. Daily quantity of hay appeared as the second most important factor (equids with more than 3 kg interacted more than equids with less than 3 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.013). Individual characteristics were also important as horses interacted more than ponies (<i>p</i> = 0.009), geldings more than mares (<i>p</i> = 0.032), and 3–15-year-old equids more than equids over 15 years (<i>p</i> = 0.032). However, there was no interaction between factors. The lower number of interactive behaviours of EAI equids leads to different hypotheses—namely, selection on temperament, specific training, or compromised welfare (apathy). In any case, our results raised new lines of questions on EAI.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Directory of Open Access Journals