Post-fire management and biocrust development interact in mid-term soil recovery after a wildfire

Understanding the role of biocrust-forming mosses in soil recovery after wildfires is necessary for assessing the resilience of managed ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term impacts of two contrasting post-fire management strategies on soil recovery in eucalypt plantations in north-central Portugal, where a high cover of biocrust-forming mosses developed post-fire, contributing to erosion control. Six years after a wildfire, we examined the legacy effects of salvage logging and two rates of mulch application using logging residues (a standard rate of 8.0 Mg ha-1 and a reduced rate of 2.6 Mg ha-1) on soil properties, and explored the interaction between moss biocrusts and forest management practices on soils. Our findings reveal the resilience of soils to physical disturbance after logging operations, with no persistent negative effects on their physicochemical properties. Although forest residue mulches showed minimal influence on soils after six years, an interesting interaction with moss biocrusts was observed. In the absence of moss cover, direct contact of wood residues with soil at the standard mulch rate promoted higher nutrient content and biochemical activity, potentially attributed to accelerated decomposition processes. Regardless of the management applied, our study highlights the role of moss biocrusts in improving soil aggregation and biochemical processes in the mid-term. However, the severe water repellency observed in these soils may have impeded further biocrust expansion. Understanding the implications of forest management practices on soil recovery after wildfires is imperative for guiding strategies aimed at promoting ecosystem recovery and resilience in fire-prone managed forest ecosystems.

Antonio Girona-García is recipient of the Grant RYC2021-031262-I funded by MICIU/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR”. This work was supported by funding by the “POSTFIRE_CARE” project of the Spanish Research Agency (AIE) and the European Union through European Funding for Regional Development (FEDER) [Ref.: CGL2016–75178-C2-1-R], and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [grant FPI-MINECO BES2017-081283 supporting Minerva García-Carmona]. The authors acknowledge the CEBAS-CSIC for the enzymatic analyses.

Peer reviewed