A Groundbreaking Comparative Investigation of Manual Versus Mechanized Grape Harvesting: Unraveling Their Impact on Must Composition, Enological Quality, and Economic Viability in Modern Romanian Viticulture
Călin Gheorghe Topan | Claudiu Ioan Bunea | Adriana Paula David | Anamaria Călugăr | Anca Cristina Babeș | Maria Popescu | Flavius Ruben Mateaș | Alexandru Nicolescu | Florin Dumitru Bora
This study evaluates the impact of grape variety and harvesting method—manual versus mechanized—on must composition, wine quality, and economic performance in the Târnave viticultural area of Romania. Four grape varieties—Pinot Noir, Sauvignon Blanc, Fetească Regală, and Muscat Ottonel—were analyzed. Manual harvesting increased reducing sugars by 4.3–5.1 g/L and decreased titratable acidity by 0.6–0.8 g/L, particularly in Pinot Noir and Muscat Ottonel. Alcohol content was higher by 0.4–0.6 vol% in manually harvested samples, and dry extract increased by 1.0–1.3 g/L. Mechanized harvesting raised catechin concentrations by 15–19 mg/L due to enhanced skin maceration, but also slightly elevated volatile acidity (by ~0.1 g/L). From an economic perspective, labor cost was reduced from 480 lei/ton (approx. EUR 96) for manual harvesting to 120 lei/ton (approx. EUR 24) with mechanization. Fuel and maintenance costs for mechanized equipment averaged 85 lei/ha (EUR 17), and equipment depreciation was estimated at 100 lei/ton (EUR 20). The total harvesting cost per ton decreased from 480–520 lei to 300–320 lei (approx. EUR 96 to EUR 64), representing a ~38% reduction. The study supports a hybrid approach: manual harvesting for sensitive or premium cultivars, and mechanization for cost-efficient, large-scale production, aligning wine quality goals with economic sustainability.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Directory of Open Access Journals