Genesis of Conventional Reservoirs in Braided Fluvial Tight Sandstones: Evidence from the He 1 Member, Upper Paleozoic, Southern Ordos Basin, China

The He 1 Member of the Xiashihezi Formation (Upper Paleozoic) in the Ordos Basin represents typical tight sandstones (&Phi: &lt: 10%, k &lt: 0.5 mD). However, against the extensive tight sandstone background of the He 1 Member in the southern basin, conventional reservoirs (&Phi: &gt: 12%, K &gt: 1 mD) occur locally. Elucidating the genetic mechanism of these conventional reservoirs is critical for evaluating gas reservoirs in this region. Based on core descriptions and systematic sampling from cored wells, reservoir types are classified according to pore types and porosity in sandstones. Depositional microfacies, petrology, and diagenesis of each reservoir type are then investigated to ultimately elucidate the genetic mechanism of conventional reservoirs. Results demonstrate that intense compaction and quartz overgrowths are the primary controls on the development of the He 1 Member tight sandstones. Alteration of volcanic lithic fragments and volcanic ash matrix generated abundant intragranular dissolution pores and micropores within the matrix, while simultaneously producing substantial illite&ndash:smectite mixed-layer clays and chlorite clays. Additionally, this process supplied silica for quartz overgrowths. Moderate amounts of chlorite coatings can inhibit quartz overgrowths, thereby preserving residual intergranular porosity. Conventional reservoirs exhibit low lithic fragment content (&lt:20 vol.%) and are characterized by a porosity assemblage of both intergranular (avg. 2.3%) and intragranular dissolution pores (avg. 6.5%). Their formation requires weak compaction, intense dissolution, and weak quartz overgrowths. These reservoirs develop within high-energy transverse bars that are sealed by overlying and underlying mudstones. Such transverse bars constitute closed intrastratal-diagenetic systems with restricted mass transfer during burial. This study provides a compelling example of diagenetic heterogeneity induced by variations in sandstone architecture within fluvial successions.