Molecular and hydraulic responses of grapevine to water status and phenology under long-term differential irrigation treatments
Damásio, Miguel | Pinto, Clara | Salguero Hernández, Julio | Alarcón Sánchez, María Victoria | Deus, João de | Soares David, Teresa | Silvestre, José | Carvalho, Luisa C. | Zarrouk, Olfa | INIAV—Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. Portugal | Universidade de Santiago de Compostela | Universidade de Lisboa. Portugal | Universidad de Extremadura. Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Ecología y Ciencias de la Tierra | Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (CICYTEX | Instituto Politécnico de Santarém. Portugal
Understanding seasonal interactions among hydraulic, chemical and molecular signalling under water deficit is crucial for improving vineyard irrigation strategies under climate change and increasing water scarcity. We aimed to test how irrigation strategies and phenology affect the hydraulic adjustment mechanisms of eight field-grown grapevine varieties under different long-term irrigation regimes: Full-irrigated (100 % ETc), deficit-irrigation (50 % Full-irrigated), and non-irrigated. Leaf pre-dawn water potential, leaf hydraulic conductivity (Kleaf), stomatal conductance, aquaporin gene expression and hormone content, were assessed at four key phenological stages, from pea-size to post-harvest. Stomatal closure was the earliest water-stress response across genotypes, while hormonal balance differentiated responsive from non-responsive genotypes regarding chemical signalling. Kleaf was primarily driven by phenology, peaking at early stages and declining thereafter. Aquaporin gene expression was both genotype- and phenology-dependent, with high activity during early stages followed by progressive down-regulation, aligned with changes in stomatal conductance and Kleaf and reflecting each variety iso-/anisohydric behaviour. This pattern confirms the role of aquaporins in grapevine hydraulic adjustments and stomatal regulation under decreasing water potentials. Aquaporins and Kleaf showed positive responses to water availability at post-harvest, indicating differential watering benefits among genotypes. Our results emphasize the need for field-phenotyping studies to fine-tune water management strategies in viticulture.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]This study was financially supported by Portugal 2030 and Fundo Europeu Agrícola para o Desenvolvimento Rural (FEADER) through the project COMPETE2030-FEDER-00630300, LISBOA2030-FEDER-00630300 (projet n.º 14616) - AI4OptiAgri. This research was also supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through the research unit Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture, and Food (LEAF): projects UID/AGR/04129/2019; UIDP/04129/2020, the research unit Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF): project UID/00239 and through DL57/2016/CP1382/CT0024 to L.C.C.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]peerReviewed
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Universidad de Extremadura