Уточнить поиск
Результаты 71-80 из 273
Effects of plant protection products on ecosystem functions provided by terrestrial invertebrates Полный текст
2025
Bertrand, Colette | Aviron, Stéphanie | Pelosi, Céline | Fabure, Juliette | Le Perchec, Sophie | Mamy, Laure | Rault, Magali | Ecologie fonctionnelle et écotoxicologie des agroécosystèmes (ECOSYS) ; AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Biodiversité agroécologie et aménagement du paysage (UMR BAGAP) ; Ecole Supérieure des Agricultures (ESA)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Département sciences pour l'action, les transitions, les territoires (ACT) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes (EMMAH) ; Avignon Université (AU)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Direction pour la Science Ouverte (DipSO) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Avignon Université (AU) | This work was funded by the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) through the national Ecophyto plan.
International audience | Plant protection products (PPP) are extensively used to protect plants against harmful organisms, but they also have unintended effects on non-target organisms, especially terrestrial invertebrates. The impact of PPP on ecosystem functions provided by these non-target invertebrates remains, however, unclear. The objectives of this article were to review PPP impacts on the ecosystem functions provided by pollinators, predators and parasitoids, and soil organisms; and to identify the factors that aggravate or mitigate PPP effects. The literature highlights that PPP alter several ecosystem functions: provision and maintenance of biodiversity, pollination, biotic interactions and habitat completeness in terrestrial ecosystems, and organic matter and soil structure dynamics. However, there are still a few studies dealing with ecosystem functions, with sometimes contradictory results, and consequences on agricultural provisioning services remain unclear. The model organisms used to assess PPP ecotoxicological effects are still limited, and should be expanded to better cover the wide functional diversity of terrestrial invertebrates. Data are lacking on PPP sublethal, transgenerational and “cocktail” effects, and on their multitrophic consequences. In empirical assessments, studies on PPP unintended effects should consider agricultural-pedoclimatic contexts because they influence the responses of non-target organisms and associated ecosystem functions to PPP. Modeling might be a promising way to account for the complex interactions among PPP mixtures, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Linking ecotoxicological effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions to impairment of ecosystem services is a challenge: an illustration with the case of plant protection products Полный текст
2025
Pesce, Stéphane | Bérard, Annette | Coutellec, Marie-Agnès | Hedde, Mickaël | Langlais-Hesse, Alexandra | Larras, Floriane | Leenhardt, Sophie | Mongruel, Rémi | Munaron, Dominique | Sabater, Sergi | Gallai, Nicola | RiverLy - Fonctionnement des hydrosystèmes (RiverLy) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes (EMMAH) ; Avignon Université (AU)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Dynamique et durabilité des écosystèmes : de la source à l’océan (DECOD) ; Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Ecologie fonctionnelle et biogéochimie des sols et des agro-écosystèmes (UMR Eco&Sols) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Institut de l'Ouest : Droit et Europe (IODE) ; Université de Rennes (UR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | Knowledge & Research in Environment And Toxicology In Silico (KREATIS) | Direction de l'Expertise scientifique collective, de la Prospective et des Etudes (DEPE) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Aménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer (AMURE) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation - MARBEC (UMR MARBEC) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM) | Universitat de Girona = University of Girona (UdG) | École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville (ENSFEA) | Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux (LEREPS) ; Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole) ; Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J) ; Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse-École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville (ENSFEA) | This collective scientific assessment received financial support from the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) through the national ECOPHYTO plan. | ANR-11-LABX-0066,SMS/SSW,Structurations des mondes sociaux(2011)
Linking ecotoxicological effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions to impairment of ecosystem services is a challenge: an illustration with the case of plant protection products Полный текст
2025
Pesce, Stéphane | Bérard, Annette | Coutellec, Marie-Agnès | Hedde, Mickaël | Langlais-Hesse, Alexandra | Larras, Floriane | Leenhardt, Sophie | Mongruel, Rémi | Munaron, Dominique | Sabater, Sergi | Gallai, Nicola | RiverLy - Fonctionnement des hydrosystèmes (RiverLy) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes (EMMAH) ; Avignon Université (AU)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Dynamique et durabilité des écosystèmes : de la source à l’océan (DECOD) ; Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Ecologie fonctionnelle et biogéochimie des sols et des agro-écosystèmes (UMR Eco&Sols) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Institut de l'Ouest : Droit et Europe (IODE) ; Université de Rennes (UR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | Knowledge & Research in Environment And Toxicology In Silico (KREATIS) | Direction de l'Expertise scientifique collective, de la Prospective et des Etudes (DEPE) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Aménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer (AMURE) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation - MARBEC (UMR MARBEC) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM) | Universitat de Girona = University of Girona (UdG) | École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville (ENSFEA) | Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux (LEREPS) ; Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole) ; Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J) ; Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse-École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville (ENSFEA) | This collective scientific assessment received financial support from the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) through the national ECOPHYTO plan. | ANR-11-LABX-0066,SMS/SSW,Structurations des mondes sociaux(2011)
International audience | There is growing interest in using the ecosystem services framework for environmental risk assessments of chemicals, including plant protection products (PPPs). Although this topic is increasingly discussed in the recent scientific literature, there is still a substantial gap between most ecotoxicological studies and a solid evaluation of potential ecotoxicological consequences on ecosystem services. This was recently highlighted by a collective scientific assessment (CSA) performed by 46 scientific experts who analyzed the international science on the impacts of PPPs on biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and ecosystem services. Here, we first point out the main obstacles to better linking knowledge on the ecotoxicological effects of PPPs on biodiversity and ecological processes with ecosystem functions and services. Then, we go on to propose and discuss possible pathways for related improvements. We describe the main processes governing the relationships between biodiversity, ecological processes, and ecosystem functions in response to effects of PPP, and we define categories of ecosystem functions that could be directly linked with the ecological processes used as functional endpoints in investigations on the ecotoxicology of PPPs. We then explore perceptions on the possible links between these categories of ecosystem functions and ecosystem services among a sub-panel of the scientific experts from various fields of environmental science. We find that these direct and indirect linkages still need clarification. This paper, which reflects the difficulties faced by the multidisciplinary group of researchers involved in the CSA, suggests that the current gap between most ecotoxicological studies and a solid potential evaluation of ecotoxicological consequences on ecosystem services could be partially addressed if concepts and definitions related to ecological processes, ecosystem functions, and ecosystem services were more widely accepted and shared within the ecotoxicology community. Narrowing this gap would help harmonize and extend the science that informs decision-making and policy-making, and ultimately help to better address the trade-off between social benefits and environmental losses caused by the use of PPPs.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Linking ecotoxicological effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions to impairment of ecosystem services is a challenge: an illustration with the case of plant protection products Полный текст
2025
Pesce, Stéphane | Bérard, Annette | Coutellec, Marie-agnès | Hedde, Mickaël | Langlais-hesse, Alexandra | Larras, Floriane | Leenhardt, Sophie | Mongruel, Remi | Munaron, Dominique | Sabater, Sergi | Gallai, Nicola
There is growing interest in using the ecosystem services framework for environmental risk assessments of chemicals, including plant protection products (PPPs). Although this topic is increasingly discussed in the recent scientific literature, there is still a substantial gap between most ecotoxicological studies and a solid evaluation of potential ecotoxicological consequences on ecosystem services. This was recently highlighted by a collective scientific assessment (CSA) performed by 46 scientific experts who analyzed the international science on the impacts of PPPs on biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and ecosystem services. Here, we first point out the main obstacles to better linking knowledge on the ecotoxicological effects of PPPs on biodiversity and ecological processes with ecosystem functions and services. Then, we go on to propose and discuss possible pathways for related improvements. We describe the main processes governing the relationships between biodiversity, ecological processes, and ecosystem functions in response to effects of PPP, and we define categories of ecosystem functions that could be directly linked with the ecological processes used as functional endpoints in investigations on the ecotoxicology of PPPs. We then explore perceptions on the possible links between these categories of ecosystem functions and ecosystem services among a sub-panel of the scientific experts from various fields of environmental science. We find that these direct and indirect linkages still need clarification. This paper, which reflects the difficulties faced by the multidisciplinary group of researchers involved in the CSA, suggests that the current gap between most ecotoxicological studies and a solid potential evaluation of ecotoxicological consequences on ecosystem services could be partially addressed if concepts and definitions related to ecological processes, ecosystem functions, and ecosystem services were more widely accepted and shared within the ecotoxicology community. Narrowing this gap would help harmonize and extend the science that informs decision-making and policy-making, and ultimately help to better address the trade-off between social benefits and environmental losses caused by the use of PPPs.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Comparison of pesticide contamination between captive-reared and wild grey partridges: insights into environmental exposure disparities Полный текст
2025
Bariod, Léa | Gaffard, Agathe | Rodrigues, Anaïs | Millet, Maurice | Bretagnolle, Vincent | Pays, Olivier | Monceau, Karine | Moreau, Jérôme | Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé - UMR 7372 (CEBC) ; La Rochelle Université (ULR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Laboratoire Chrono-environnement (UMR 6249) (LCE) ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Franche-Comté (UFC) ; Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC) | Institut de chimie et procédés pour l'énergie, l'environnement et la santé (ICPEES) ; Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut de Chimie - CNRS Chimie (INC-CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Matériaux et Nanosciences Grand-Est (MNGE) ; Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar (Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA))-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut de Chimie - CNRS Chimie (INC-CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar (Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA))-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | Zone Atelier Plaine et Val de Sèvre (LTSER-ZAPVS) ; LTSER Réseau des Zones Ateliers (RZA) ; Institut Ecologie et Environnement - CNRS Ecologie et Environnement (INEE-CNRS) ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Ecologie et Environnement - CNRS Ecologie et Environnement (INEE-CNRS) ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | Biodiversité dans l’Anthropocène - Dynamique, Fonction & Gestion (BIODIVAG) ; Université d'Angers (UA) | Reconciling Ecological and Human Adaptations for Biosphere Sustainability (REHABS) ; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL) ; Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Nelson Mandela University [Port Elizabeth] | Biogéosciences [UMR 6282] (BGS) ; Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | This research was funded by the French National Centre of Scientific Research (CNRS) | the French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE) | the BioBird project funded by the regional government of Nouvelle-Aquitaine | the French National Program EC2CO (Ecosphère Continentale et Côtière)
International audience | Pesticide contamination is often cited as a key factor in the global decline of farmland birds. However, the majority of studies on pesticide exposure in non-target fauna are not representative of what happens in nature because they are limited to artificial conditions. The aim of this study was to define and compare, for the first time, pesticide contamination in grey partridges (Perdix perdix) from two different contexts, i.e., captivity vs. the wild. Blood samples taken from 35 captive and 54 wild partridges in 2021-2022 were analysed for 94 pesticides most commonly used in French agriculture. Captive partridges had 29 molecules detected in their blood (12 herbicides, 14 fungicides, and three insecticides) compared to wild partridges, which had 50 molecules (13 herbicides, 23 fungicides, and 14 insecticides). Of these pesticide compounds found in individuals, 26 were banned. Captive partridges had significantly fewer pesticide molecules than wild partridges, with one to 14 pesticides per captive individual and 8 to 20 pesticides per wild individual. Nineteen molecules were common to both groups, with concentrations up to three times higher in wild partridges than in captive partridges. Our results thus show multiple exposures for most of our individuals, especially in wild partridges, which can lead to cocktail effects, which are never considered. Furthermore, the difference in contamination between the wild and captive partridges reflects the multiple routes of contamination in nature, in particular, due to the use of a wide range of habitats by wild partridges.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Health Risks Status for Two Seaweeds of Economic Interest in Northwest Africa Полный текст
2025
Bousso, Ndeye Coumba | Brehmer, Patrice | Kane, Cheikhou | Quack, Birgit | Ndiaye, Waly | Diadhiou, Hamet Diaw | Diedhiou, Fulgence | Waeles, Mathieu
Seaweeds hold significant potential for human nutrition due to its high content of essential minerals and trace elements. In Africa, the development of the blue economy promotes their sustainable exploitation. However, harmful elements such as arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd) can accumulate in seaweeds, posing potential health risks upon consumption. Meristotheca senegalensis and Hypnea musciformis, two seaweeds of economic interest in Senegal, were collected in various locations, and their concentrations of essential nutrients, heavy metals, and transition metals were analyzed. Notably, cadmium levels in all samples exceeded established toxicity thresholds. A health risk assessment was performed, evaluating non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks through estimated daily intakes, target hazard quotients, hazard indexes, and carcinogenic risks. For adults, a low daily intake of seaweed (0.1 g day-1) posed no significant health risk over long-term exposure. High (8 g day-1) and medium (4 g day-1) daily intake levels posed no risk for adults and children, respectively, over 6-month exposure. In addition, seaweed represents a valuable iron source for preventing deficiency in Senegalese populations. Such intake levels could be incorporated into agro-food products for trace element enrichment. Nevertheless, for children, site-specific selection is critical to avoid carcinogenic risks over prolonged exposure. Seaweed offers a valuable opportunity for addressing food and nutrition security as well as promoting economic growth within Africa’s blue economy. However, careful scientific evaluation, particularly regarding site selection, is essential to ensure safe and sustainable uses, especially in countries like those in Africa, where marine pollution monitoring is often limited.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Plastic-Associated Pathogens in Marine Environments: A Meta-Analysis Полный текст
2025
Naudet, Jeanne | Roque D'Orbcastel, Emmanuelle | Bouvier, Thierry | Auguet, Jean-christophe
The global accumulation of plastic debris in marine ecosystems is continually increasing. Understanding the interaction between these debris and the bacterial biofilm on their surface is essential, particularly with regard to potential human pathogenic bacteria (PHPB). In this meta-analysis, we re-evaluated 16S rRNA metabarcoding data from 35 plastisphere-related studies, published up to late 2022. We compared the bacteriomes of plastics and other marine substrates, identifying PHPB associated with each type of substrate. PHPB were enriched in the plastisphere compared to the surrounding water but did not appear more abundant nor richer in than in other marine solid substrates. Nevertheless, we described a distinctive PHPB signature associated with plastics, including Vibrionaceae bacteria (5 % of the whole plastisphere) and biomarkers such as Staphylococcus haemolyticus. The contribution of other marine substrates to plastic PHPB was quantified and we found that shell and wood substrates were potential sources of PHPB for plastics. Our results suggest that both plastics and other marine solid substrates could serve as reservoirs for PHPB. However, plastics convey specific PHPB communities, and due to their ubiquity and persistence in marine ecosystems, plastic debris poses a higher risk as fomites compared to other substrates.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Using citizen science to inventory and map abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) Полный текст
2025
Morfin, Marie | Mehault, Sonia | Miquerol, Laetitia | Coupa Dufau, Quentin | Kopp, Dorothee
A considerable proportion of marine plastic pollution consists of abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG). Whether still intact or break down into fragments, ALDFG is a widespread, enduring problem, and as such, it represents an ideal case for the use of citizen science. The Fish&Click program proposes a mobile application and website to enable non-specialist observers, such as walkers, divers, or sailors, to record their sightings of ALDFG. The simple interface allows the user to characterize found gear without any expert knowledge, and an analysis of these data can shed light on the magnitude and spatio-temporal composition of the ALDFG phenomenon. This report presents the results and feedback from the first two years of Fish&Click, from May 2020 to June 2022, in the north of the Bay of Biscay, Celtic Sea, and English Channel. In addition to a database cleaning procedure, we defined an ad hoc methodology for analyzing these non-standardized data. Using this, we found that the types and quantities of found gear differ between sea and shore locations and were also different from one region to another. We discuss the pros and cons of this citizen-science program, as well as the potential for improvements that might help to mitigate pollution by ALDFG.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Organohalogen contaminants of emerging concern in common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) from the Bay of Biscay (NE Atlantic): Occurrence and 2000–2023 temporal patterns Полный текст
2025
Munschy, Catherine | Aminot, Yann | Caurant, Florence | Dabin, Willy | Mauchamp, Audrey | Méndez- Fernandez, Paula | Mille, Tiphaine | Pollono, Charles | Spitz, Jérôme | Chouvelon, Tiphaine
The contamination of marine mammals by legacy pollutants has been largely studied in oceans worldwide. However, international regulations have given rise to the replacement of legacy substances by alternative compounds, which represent a potential additional threat to marine mammal health and conservation. In this study, we investigated the occurrence and temporal trends of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the blubber of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) from the Bay of Biscay, North-East Atlantic, and in their major prey. Alternative brominated flame retardants were below the limits of quantification in all samples, while dechlorane-related compounds were identified as the major CECs, at levels of 4.6 ± 5.9 ng g−1 lw, i.e. similar to or higher than those reported in various marine mammals from other oceanic regions. The concentrations of 3,6-dichlorocarbazole (3,6-CCZ), the major polyhalogenated carbazole, and of methyl-triclosan were one order of magnitude lower. The halogenated natural products, methoxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers (MeO-BDEs), were also investigated and showed substantially higher concentrations than all CECs, i.e. 322 ± 214 ng g−1 lw. Declorane-602, anti-monohydro dechlorane plus and MeO-BDEs were the only compounds showing biomagnification between small pelagic fish and dolphins. No significant differences in most CEC concentrations were found over the studied time period, indicating that these compounds are still emitted in the environment and/or have long residence times in the dolphins’ blubber. Conversely, methyl-triclosan concentrations significantly decreased over the studied period. An increase in MeO-BDE concentrations in the last two decades might reveal a change in algal production in relation to global warming.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Biodegradable fishing gears: A potential solution to ghost fishing and marine plastic pollution Полный текст
2025
Wataniyakun, Waranya | Le Gall, Maelenn | El Rakwe, Maria | Karl, Christian W. | Larsen, Roger B
Fishing gears are conventionally made from non-biodegradable materials including polyamide (PA). When lost in the ocean, these gears have long-lasting impacts, including marine littering, microplastics production, leaching of chemicals, and an extended period of ghost fishing due to its durability. The use of biodegradable co-polyester material such as polybutylene succinate co-adipate-co-terephthalate (PBSAT) and polybutylene succinate-co-butylene adipate (PBSA) as fishing gear materials have been considered as a potential solution to reduce the associated impact. Ocean is a complex environment in which multiple degradation paths can occur for plastic materials, and decoupling of factors could aid in understanding the impact of each potential factor. In this study, the focus is on the impact of pure water hydrolysis phenomena on biodegradable co-polyester PBSAT and PBSA in comparison to PA monofilaments through accelerated aging at 40 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C and 80 °C. As a single factor accelerated aging process, the prediction of loss of mechanical strength over time was possible at other temperatures namely 2 °C, 10 °C, 15 °C, 20 °C and 30 °C. Different end-of-life criteria were used. This study concluded that solely through pure hydrolysis, a drastic reduction of the time to reach end-of-life criteria was observed by using biodegradable monofilaments instead of PA, but still longer than the expected service time. For example, at 2 °C, it would take approximately 10 years, 20 years and 1000 years for PBSAT, PBSA and PA to have lost 50 % of their initial stress at break respectively.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Use of capture based metagenomic to assess human enteric virus diversity in sewage and shellfish samples Полный текст
2025
Schaeffer, Julien | Indio, Valentina | Troja, Fulvia | Desdouits, Marion | De Cesare, Alessandra | Le Guyader, Soizick
Human sewage is the main source of contamination of environmental waters with human enteric viruses, that can contaminate food such as shellfish. Metagenomic represents a new way of analyzing viral diversity through an a priori massive parallel sequencing approach. However, the precise identification of enteric viruses in sewage or shellfish matrices, is still challenging due to the low viral load, large diversity of viral genera and the large amounts of matrix masking viral sequences. This work compared three commercial kits using capture-based enrichment during the library preparation, for the diversity of detected enteric viruses and for the identification of viral strains in sewage and shellfish samples, focusing on four families impacting human health. Triplicate libraries were prepared for each sample and each kit. All three kits allowed the characterization of a variety of viral genera. In sewage samples, a large number of long contigs was obtained allowing a precise identification of more than 35 strains. In shellfish samples, long contigs were rarer but allowed the identification of one human astrovirus and one norovirus strains. Of the tested kits, one displayed lower variation between replicates, allowed to sequence a higher diversity of viruses from the four families of interest and yielded a higher number of nearly-whole genomes.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Modelling Escherichia coli concentrations : 45.6 %–78.1 % of China's rivers show poor microbial water quality Полный текст
2025
Mei, Songtao | Wang, Kai | Schmitt, Heike | Hofstra, Nynke
Water quality is under threat due to the presence of pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Escherichia coli (E. coli) serves as an indicator of faecal contamination and the potential presence of other harmful pathogens. Understanding E. coli concentrations helps in assessing the overall health risks associated with waterborne diseases and developing effective water management strategies. Therefore, we developed the first large-scale model, GloWPa-Ecoli C1 to simulate E. coli loads and concentrations in rivers and apply this model to China. The model provides the first comprehensive overview of microbial water quality across China's rivers. The model simulates E. coli concentrations in 2020 to range from 10−1.2 to 106.3 CFU/L, with 45.6 %–78.1 % of rivers exhibiting poor microbial water quality. Major hotspots of E. coli pollution are Haihe, Huaihe and Pearl River Basins. Direct discharge of human faecal waste contributes 80.2 % of the total E. coli load, while directly discharged livestock waste accounts for 13.1 %. To mitigate E. coli pollution in rivers in China, we recommend increasing human faecal waste collection rates, expanding wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) coverage, phasing out primary treatment WWTPs and eliminating direct livestock faecal waste discharge, particularly from smallholder farms. The study underscores the urgent need to improve microbial water quality in China's rivers. The findings provide actionable insights to inform policy development aimed at safeguarding water quality and public health. Furthermore, the modelling approach is applicable to other regions and microorganisms, offering a foundation for developing models to address antibiotic-resistant bacteria and other emerging water quality challenges.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]