Spatial data is constantly evolving, and the accuracy of spatial data is constantly changing. The latest GRPK and orthophotographic map were used in the study. Accuracy is also affected by technological advances, which are driven by improvements in working methods, which include the development of work tools and the development of data sets that contain structured data. The data contained in the data sets are determined by a variety of methods, such as field measurements (GPNS receiver or tacheometer) and analysis of digital photographic images, which are determined using aircraft or satellite systems. The determined data is processed with the help of specialized software, which is selected depending on its functionality and capabilities, and with the help of which the determined data is processed as accurately as possible. Accurate spatial data in densely populated areas makes it easier to carry out planning and design work correctly. The study is performed to determine the accuracy of the coordinates of the selected structures using remote methods. The more similar studies are conducted, the more confident the GRPK data generated remotely will be of the required accuracy, reliability, and applicability to planning, forecasting, and other important tasks. The article compares geodetic measurements and GRPK data and geodetic measurements and ORT10LT data, identifies coordinate differences, the size of the discrepancy and its average, and calculates the root mean square error. The object of the research is spatial and cartographic data of different buildings. The aim of the research is to determine and evaluate the accuracy of the coordinates obtained using remote sensing methods.

Recently, the opinion has been expressed that the phasing of the processes of preparation of territorial planning documents, depending on the institution that administers it, hinders the processes of preparation of territorial planning documents by established procedural actions. The aim of the article is to evaluate the impact of the efficiency of the administration of territorial planning processes on the development of territories. The object of the research is the complex and special territorial planning documents prepared in the territory of Pagėgiai municipality. Pagėgiai municipality was chosen because the preparation of planning documents in the municipality has slowed down recently, therefore it is important to assess the efficiency of administration of the prepared territorial planning document processes, possible impact on further territorial development, and provide recommendations to ensure more efficient and faster territorial development. During the research, it was established that during the period between the years 2010–2020 only 1 state-level territorial planning document was registered in the territory of Pagėgiai municipality (i.e. 0.69% of those registered in the Republic of Lithuania and 14.29% in Tauragė County). 7 (i.e. 0.52% of those registered in the Republic of Lithuania and 18.42% of those registered in Tauragė County) were registered in the municipality at the municipal level. Territorial planning documents were registered at the local level (i.e. 0.22% of those registered in the Republic of Lithuania and 5.4% in Tauragė County). The analysis of the processes of the prepared planning documents and the interviews of experts revealed that the planning procedures performed by the administering authorities are inefficient: not all the administering authorities consistently carry out the assigned procedures, delay or evaluating the planned decisions within the legal deadline. According to experts, the reason for the inefficient performance of procedures is the lack of human resources in the administering institutions or their inadequate competence. As a result, the improperly performed procedures of territorial planning documents have a negative impact on the planned territory, slow down its development, or the most suitable possible development direction of the planned territory has not been assessed. After performing a multi-criteria analysis of the prepared territorial planning documents, it was established that in the period under review, the most effective document of complex territorial planning was prepared in the territory of Pagėgiai municipality — “Adjustment of the detailed plan of the prepared territory in Vilniaus st. 16 A, Pagėgiai”. The rating indicator was 0.0806. The document of complex territorial planning “Adjustment of Pagėgiai city comprehensive plan” stood out with the lowest efficiency, the rating indicator was — 0.0676.

For photogrammetric works, a fundamental issue is the determination of camera internal orientation parameters (IOP). Without camera calibration, it is difficult to imagine a correct adjustment of the image network. Many industries use nonmetric cameras, ranging from automatics and robotics, to heritage inventories, and the increasingly popular social mapping phenomenon uses low-budget cameras. Many different calibration methods exist, but dedicated calibration fields are commonly replaced by fast in-plane calibration with regular patterns. The main goal of this research is to verify the thesis that calibrating cameras on a checkerboard gives worse results in determining IOP than on a laboratory test field which may translate into the resulting model. For the purpose of this study, a special field was constructed, allowing calibration of the instruments on the basis of the network solution by the bundle adjustment. Unlike classical 2D fields, the field is equipped with a cork background providing a good base for matching and automatically detecting measurement marks. Calibration results were compared with calibration performed on a checkerboard implemented in MATLAB Camera Calibration Toolbox. In order to determine IOP in MATLAB, images of the checkerboard must be taken in such a way, that the whole pattern fits into the frame, otherwise toolbox defines the incorrectly coordinate system, which has a bad impact on calibration results. Moreover, the determined parameters have several times larger standard deviations than those determined in the laboratory test field, which confirms the thesis.