Effect of Agricultural Byproduct Supplementation on Growth Performance and Blood Parameters of Broiler Chicken: Meta-analysis
2018
Lee, J., Kyungpook National University, Sangju, Republic of Korea | Kim, D.H., Gyeongbuk Provincial College, Yechon, Republic of Korea | Lee, J.H., Gyeongbuk Provincial College, Yechon, Republic of Korea | Kim, E.J., Kyungpook National University, Sangju, Republic of Korea | Cho, S., Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea | Lee, S.M., Kyungpook National University, Sangju, Republic of Korea
The present study investigated effect of supplementation of agricultural byproduct on growth performance and blood parameters of broiler chicken using meta-analysis. Total 11 studies (32 experiments) where broiler feeding trials with agricultural byproducts were included were employed in analysis. All studies were conducted at commercial farm placed in South Korea and under commercial feeding programs. Growth phases were divided into two groups based on slaughter day. For growth performance, body weight, body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion rate (feed/gain) were investigated. Carcass weight, dressing percentage, liver and spleen weight, blood glucose, total cholesterol and triglyceride, HDL (High density lipoprotein) and LDL (Low density lipoprotein) cholesterol contents in blood were investigated. Body weight of broiler of treatment was significantly increased than the control (P less than 0.05), regardless of growth phase. However, body weight gain during late growth phase did not show significant difference between control and treatment. Effect evaluated by random effect model on feed intake was not significant. Effect on feed conversion rate during early growth phase was significantly negative (P less than 0.05). Effects on carcass weight, dressing percentage, liver and spleen weight were not significant in random effect model. Effect on abdominal fat was significantly negative (P less than 0.05). In blood parameters, significant effects were found at total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL cholesterol (P less than 0.05). Effect on HDL cholesterol only was positive effect, and others were negative.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]