Pathway to impact: Is REDD+ a viable theory of change?
2018
a.m. larson | a. angelsen | b. belcher | t.t. pham | c. martius | d.j. sonwa
Key messagesA REDD+ theory of change is expected to outline pathways using conditional incentives to achieve reduced emissions. But as practised, REDD+ has evolved into a diversity of measures, while the core element, conditionality, has rarely been applied.Confusion arises when actors fail to distinguish between REDD+ as the outcome of reduced emissions and the framework to achieve them. Convoluted objectives, unclear donor commitments, and competing ideas about what REDD+ is and should pay for (compensation level, beneficiaries), complicate its implementation.The way forward lies in recognising ideological differences for more constructive debates, clarifying technical objectives and embracing pragmatism in implementation
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]C. Martius et al., 'Pathway to impact: Is REDD+ a viable theory of change?', Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia, 2018
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]