Typology of a Great River Using Fish Assemblages: Implications for the Bioassessment of the Danube River
2017
Erős, T. | Bammer, V. | György, Á. I. | Pehlivanov, L. | Schabuss, M. | Zornig, H. | Weiperth, A. | Szalóky, Z.
Matching habitat typology and ecological assemblages can be useful in environmental management. We examined whether a priori defined riverine sections correspond with distinct fish assemblage types along the >2000 km long course of the Danube River, Europe. We also tested whether different sampling methods (i.e. day and night inshore electric fishing and offshore benthic trawling) provide consistent typological results. Analysis of assemblage similarities, indicator species analysis, non‐metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and k‐means analyses indicated that fish assemblages of the a priori defined Upper‐, Middle and Lower‐Danubian sections differed slightly, but within class variability was high. Although indicator species analysis showed that the Upper‐Danube belongs to the barbel (Barbus barbus) zone and the Middle‐ and Lower Danube belong to the bream (Abramis spp) zone, indicator values of the character species were generally low. The NMDS analyses suggested a weak gradient in assemblage structure along the course of the river with relatively high variability between neighbouring sites. K‐means analyses revealed that many sampling sites were in a different class than the a priori defined sections, and classifications at other group numbers did not lead to better classification outcome. Overall, the results do not suggest clearly distinguishable assemblage types with distinct boundaries in the potamal section of a great river. Nevertheless, the division of the potamon to smaller sections may explain some variability in fish assemblage structure, and could be used for bioassessment purposes. The study also shows the importance of multihabitat and multigear surveys in the typological assessment of great rivers. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]