Optimal design of extractive distillation for acetic acid dehydration with N-methyl acetamide
2017
You, Xinqiang | Gu, Jinglian | Peng, Changjun | Rodriguez Donis, Ivonne | Liu, Honglai | State Key laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Department of Chemistry ; East China University of Science and Technology | School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering ; Wuhan Textile University | Chimie Agro-Industrielle (CAI) ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Ecole nationale supérieure des ingénieurs en arts chimiques et technologiques (ENSIACET) ; Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP) ; Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP) ; Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT) | Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (No. 2016M601528) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21606026 and 21276073)
International audience
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]英语. A distinctive strategy for entrainer recycling is proposed in this work for acetic acid (AA) dehydration by extractive distillation by using N methyl acetamide (NMA). The use of standard entrainers such as DMF or DMSO has the main drawback of forming an azeotrope with acetic acid. However, the vapour liquid equilibrium AA – NMA exhibits a tangential pinch point at NMA end composition. The new strategy rises from the thermodynamic analysis of the ternary diagram that which involves no azeotrope. As a result, acetic acid with high purity can be obtained by the recycling of the entrainer with a relaxed constraint in its purity. Optimization studies are discussed by using two approaches: two-step optimization method with Sequential Quadratic Programming (TSOM case) and the multi-objective genetic algorithm. The multi-objective genetic algorithm allowed the computation of the optimal acetic acid dehydration with an impurity of 3% in the recycled entrainer. Significant cost savings are achieved thanks to the optimization of both columns together. Energy consumption is reduced by 12.8% and 56.9% whereas TAC is saved by 28.4% and 56.3% compared with optimal case TSOM (impurity content 1%) and a published “Case Ref” (impurity content 0.01%), respectively.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]