The issue of how support for public stockholding (PSH) programs is calculated and disciplined within the WTO Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) has been a point of contention since 2012. PSH was largely uncontroversial during the Doha negotiations, where issues like the Special Safeguard Mechanism, domestic support, and cotton contributed to the collapse of negotiations in 2008 (Blustein 2009; Jones 2010; Margulis 2023). However, members who raised administered prices to keep up with surging market prices in the late 2000s found themselves facing potential challenges, as support levels for PSH programs threatened to exceed domestic support commitments under the AoA. At the Ministerial Conference in Bali in 2013 (MC 9), members agreed to an interim mechanism, which granted a “peace clause” to countries with existing PSH programs, effectively shielding them from challenges regarding compliance with domestic support obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. Under the Bali Decision, members agreed to provide data on how the program operated and to ensure that such programs were not trade distorting or would not affect the food security of other WTO members. PSH remains controversial and members failed to reach agreement on a permanent solution at subsequent Ministerials in Nairobi, Buenos Aires and Geneva. More than 10 years later, failure to reach an agreement on PSH continues to block significant progress in overall negotiations.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]
AGRIS - 国际农业科技情报系统
Share
出版者
International Food Policy Research Institute
语言
英语
许可
Open Access, CC-BY-SA-3.0-IGO
类型
Book Chapter; Book Part; Book
来源
Glauber, Joseph W. 2024. Public stockholding programs and the WTO. In Navigating the trade landscape: A Latin American perspective building on the WTO 13th ministerial conference, eds. Valeria Piñeiro, Adriana Campos, and Martin Piñeiro. Chapter 5, Pp. 42-59. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151907
团体作者
United States Agency for International Development
Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura
2024-10-31
2026-02-03
MODS
在Google Scholar上查找
如果您发现与此记录相关的任何错误信息，请联系 [email protected]