One of the Uruguay Round’s more notable achievements was the establishment of the WTO Dispute Settlement System, considered as the “Jewel in the Crown” of the WTO. When the Uruguay Round negotiations were initiated in 1986, there was a growing consensus that the original GATT dispute settlement system was ineffective. Compliance was a key failing of the old system; GATT contracting countries either blocked or simply ignored the findings of panels. The GATT’s consensus rule meant any party—including the potential respondent in a trade dispute who might be accused of wrongdoing—could block not only rulings but even the initiation of an inquiry. Thus, third-party intermediation was often not possible to resolve trade frictions (Bown, 2019).
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]
AGRIS - 国际农业科技情报系统
Share
出版者
Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura
语言
英语
许可
Open Access, CC-BY-SA-3.0-IGO
类型
Book Chapter; Book Part; Book
来源
Bianchi, Eduardo. 2021. Food products, the WTO dispute settlement system and trade remedies. In The road to the WTO twelfth Ministerial Conference: A Latin American and Caribbean perspective, eds. Valeria Piñeiro, Adriana Campos, and Martín Piñeiro. Other topics relevant for Agriculture and the WTO, Pp. 145-155. San Jose, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA); and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134829. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115869
2024-11-28
2026-02-03
MODS
在Google Scholar上查找
如果您发现与此记录相关的任何错误信息，请联系 [email protected]