Exploring Pathogenic and Zoonotic Bacteria from Wild Rodents, Dogs, and Humans of the Ngorongoro District in Tanzania Using Metagenomics Next-Generation Sequencing
2023
Amina Ramadhani Issae | Abdul Selemani Katakweba | Rose Peter Kicheleri | Augustino Alfred Chengula | Marco van Zwetselaar | Christopher Jacob Kasanga
Globally, zoonoses have serious consequences due to their socioeconomic impacts. Ngorongoro District is home to a diverse range of wildlife and domestic animals, including rodents and dogs, which often coexist in close proximity with humans. The aim of the study was to identify the zoonotic bacteria present in wild rodents, domestic dogs, and humans using metagenomics next-generation sequencing technology. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022. This study used both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing technologies to identify bacteria in 530 blood samples collected from humans (<i>n</i> = 200), wild rodents (<i>n</i> = 230), and dogs (<i>n</i> = 100). Several zoonotic airborne/contagious bacteria, including <i>Mycobacterium</i> spp., <i>Mycoplasma</i> spp., <i>Bordetella</i> spp., and <i>Legionella</i> spp., were detected in wild rodents, domestic dogs, and humans. Arthropod-borne zoonotic bacteria such as <i>Bartonella</i> spp., <i>Borrelia</i> spp., and <i>Rickettsia</i> spp. were detected in all three hosts, while <i>Orientia</i> spp. was found in wild rodents and domestic dogs. <i>Yersinia pestis, Streptobacillus</i> spp. and <i>Anaplasma</i> spp. were found only in wild rodents. Other zoonotic bacteria found shared among wild rodents, domestic dogs, and humans are <i>Leptospira</i> spp., <i>Brucella</i> spp., and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. Generally, wild rodents had the highest prevalence of zoonotic bacterial species when compared to domestic dogs and humans. The detection of zoonotic bacteria in rodents, dogs, and humans supports the hypothesis that infections can spread between animals and humans sharing the same environment.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]