OBJECTIVE To evaluate accuracy of articular surfaces determined by use of 2 perpendicular CT orientations, micro-CT, and laser scanning. SAMPLE 23 cat cadavers. PROCEDURES Images of antebrachia were obtained by use of CT (voxel size, 0.6 mm) in longitudinal orientation (CTLO images) and transverse orientation (CTTO images) and by use of micro-CT (voxel size, 0.024 mm) in a longitudinal orientation. Images were reconstructed. Craniocaudal and mediolateral length, radius of curvature, and deviation of the articular surface of the distal portion of the radius of 3-D renderings for CTLO, CTTO, and micro-CT images were compared with results of 3-D renderings acquired with a laser scanner (resolution, 0.025 mm). RESULTS Measurement of CTLO and CTTO images overestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length of the articular surface by 4% to 10%. Measurement of micro-CT images underestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length by 1%. Measurement of CTLO and CTTO images underestimated mediolateral radius of curvature by 15% and overestimated craniocaudal radius of curvature by > 100%; use of micro-CT images underestimated them by 3% and 5%, respectively. Mean ± SD surface deviation was 0.26 ± 0.09 mm for CTLO images, 0.30 ± 0.28 mm for CTTO images, and 0.04 ± 0.02 mm for micro-CT images. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Articular surface models derived from CT images had dimensional errors that approximately matched the voxel size. Thus, CT cannot be used to plan conforming arthroplasties in small joints and could lack precision when used to plan the correction of a limb deformity or repair of a fracture.

Conventional geometric formulas for estimating bladder volume assume that bladders have a perfectly uniform spheroid geometry. Bladders are often irregularly shaped, however, especially when under-filled or distorted by a full colon, which results in inaccurate ultrasonographic linear measurements and volume estimation. This pilot study investigates the feasibility, inter-observer reliability (reproducibility), robustness, and agreement of a novel 3-dimensional bladder volume computation method using bladder circumference tracing compared to a published feline linear bladder dimension formula. Paired sets of longitudinal and transverse B-mode bladder ultrasound images (n = 228) were acquired by 2 observers with different point-of-care ultrasonography skills using 10 healthy purpose-bred cats positioned in dorsal recumbency at various time points. Using strict criteria for Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, inter-observer agreements (n = 223) were found to be substantial (0.95 to 0.99) with statistically significant but clinically non-significant median differences (biases) of 0.96 mL [interquartile range (IQR): 0.16 to 2.46, P < 0.001] and 0.23 mL (IQR: 0.88 to 1.97, P = 0.006) when bladder circumference tracings were made on similar sets of ultrasound images respectively. Inter-observer agreements improved from substantial (0.95 to 0.99) to almost perfect (> 0.99) strength-of-agreement as the quality of ultrasound images improved. The bladder circumference tracing method showed moderate (0.90 to 0.95) strength-of-agreement with the recently published feline linear bladder dimension formula, with significant additive median differences (biases) of -6.76 mL (IQR: -9.06 to -3.88, P < 0.001) and -6.44 mL (IQR: -11.41 to -3.81, P < 0.001) recorded by each observer (n = 111, n = 83), respectively. Data obtained from orthogonal ultrasonographic bladder circumference tracings justify further investigation into use of this method for estimating bladder volume in cats.