A high-performance liquid chromatography method was developed for determination of flunixin in bovine plasma. The extraction procedure was easily performed and made it possible to detect low concentrations of flunixin with high accuracy. The limit of quantitation was 7 ng/ml (relative standard deviation = 18%, n = 10). The analytic method permits processing of 60 samples/d. Flunixin, as well as the internal standard (diclofenac sodium), belong to the group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are known to have a high degree of binding to plasma proteins. Therefore, an evaluation of several buffer systems was undertaken to optimize analytic conditions. Cattle were given 2.2 mg of flunixin meglumine/kg of body weight. In experiment 1, single injections were administered IV to q cow and IM to 1 heifer (7 days apart), and pharmacokinetic variables were calculated. The IV data were best described by a two-compartment model. The half-life after single IV or IM administration was around 4.0 hours. In experiment 2, the decreasing flunixin concentration was determined after the last of either 4 IM injections daily (n = 3 cows) or 2 IM injections daily (n = 3 cows) administered during a 14-day postpartum period. The half-life, determined between 48 and 96 hours after the last dose, was approximately 26 hours in both groups, and flunixin could be detected in plasma up to 8 days, on average. The protein binding of flunixin was studied, using the method of equilibrium dialysis. Flunixin was found to have a high degree of protein binding (ie, 99.4 +/- 0.2%) at a flunixin concentration in plasma of 3 to micrograms/ml. Differences in protein binding between cattle were not found.

Using 7 penicillins (amoxicillin, ampicillin, methicillin, penicillin G, oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin), simultaneous and direct determination of residual penicillins in biological samples was carried out by use of bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric or fluorometric detectors. By use of assay medium seeded with penicillin-sensitive Micrococcus luteus (ATCC No. 9341) as a test organism, we were able to detect penicillins even at low concentrations. All penicillins treated with 10 U of penicillinase/ml did not produce inhibition zones by disk testing, even at a concentration of 100 micrograms of penicillin/ml/assay plate. Using a mobile phase of acetonitrile:methanol:0.01M KH2PO4 (19:11:70, v/v/v; pH, 7.1), standard solutions of the penicillins were separated from each other by use of high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, producing symmetric peaks without tailing, each of which had a characteristic retention time. Simultaneous detection of residual penicillins in bovine serum, kidneys, and liver, for the 5 penicillins for which analysis was possible by use of the UV method, yielded recovery rates from 71.4 to 102.3%; for the 2 amino-penicillins, amoxicillin and ampicillin, which could only be detected by use of the fluorometric method, recovery rate ranged from 72.9 to 103%.

A radioimmunoassay test for tetracyclines (Charm II) was compared with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) for detection of oxytetracycline (OTC) residues in milk samples from individual lactating cows. Oxytetracycline was administered by 1 of 3 routes (IV, IM, or intrauterine) to 21 lactating dairy cows. A total of 292 duplicate milk samples were collected from milkings before and through 156 hours after OTC administration. Concentration of OTC in these samples was determined by use of the Charm II test and an HPLC method with a lower limit of quantitation, approximately 2 ng of OTC/ml. Samples were also classified with respect to presence of OTC residues relative to the FDA safe concentration (less than or equal to 30 ng/ml), using the Charm II (by control point determination) and HPLC methods. There was a significant (P less than or equal to 0.05) difference between test methods in classification of milk samples with respect to presence or absence of OTC at the FDA safe concentration. A total of 48 of the 292 test results (16.4%) did not agree. Using the HPLC test results as the standard with which Charm II test results were compared, 47 false presumptive-violative test results and 1 false presumptive-nonviolative Charm II test result (a sample containing 31 ng of OTC/ml, as evaluated by HPLC) were obtained. The samples with false presumptive-violative Charm II results contained (less than or equal to 30 ng of OTC/ml, as evaluated by HPLC. In some respects, the Charm II test performed appropriately as a screening test to detect OTC residues in milk samples from individual cows. However, the tendency for the test to yield presumptive-violative test results at OTC concentrations lower than the FDA safe concentration (as evaluated by HPLC), suggests that caution should be exercised in using the test as the sole basis on which a decision is made to reject milk. As indicated by the manufacturer, presumptive-violative Charm II test results should be confirmed by additional testing Although not specifically evaluated, the tendency for misclassification of milk samples as presumptive-violative by the Charm II test may or may not occur in commingled milk, compared with milk samples from individual cows.

A cross-over study was performed in 6 healthy mixed-breed dogs and 4 healthy Beagles. Diazepam was administered per rectum to Beagles (0.5 mg/kg of body weight) and mixed-breed dogs (2 mg/kg), and IV (0.5 mg/kg) to both groups of dogs. Each dog received the drug by both routes, with a 1-week washout period between dosages. After diazepam administration, blood samples were collected to measure plasma concentration of diazepam and its active metabolites, desmethyldiazepam and oxazepam, by use of reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Systemic availability was assessed by comparing the area under the curve for diazepam metabolites for each route of administration. Mean (+/- SD) diazepam concentrations in plasma after rectal administration were low in comparison with those obtained after IV administration, with systemic availability of only 7.4 (+/- 5.9) and 2.7 (+/- 3.2)% for the high and low dose, respectively. However, diazepam was converted to its metabolites within minutes after administration. Accounting for the total concentration of benzodiazepines (diazepam plus desmethyldiazepam and oxazepam) in plasma, systemic availability was 79.9 (+/- 20.7) and 66.0 (+/- 23.8)% for the high and low dosage, respectively. After IV administration, diazepam concentration decreased, with a half-life of only 14 to 16 minutes, but desmethyldiazepam and oxazepam concentrations decreased more slowly, with a half-life of 2.2 to 2.8 hours and 3.5 to 5.1 hours, respectively. Each of the metabolites is reported to have anticonvulsant activity. After rectal administration of the high dose, mean total benzodiazepine concentration was above 1.0 micrograms/ml within 10 minutes and was maintained above this concentration for at least 6 hours. We conclude that diazepam is absorbed after rectal administration in dogs, and that the pharmacologic effects are probably caused by the active metabolites, not the parent drug. Samples also were analyzed by use of a nonspecific commercial benzodiazepine fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). Correlation between the FPLA and HPLC assay was strongest for diazeparn (R2 = 0.84), weak for desmethyldiazepam (R2 = 0.09), and nonexistent for oxazepam. We conclude from a comparison of assays that HPLC is preferred over the FPLA method for measuring benzodiazepines in dogs.