This study proposes an integrated cattle breeding and cultivation system that provides zero emission and sustainable livelihood for the community in rural areas. The proposed integrated farming system improves agricultural productivity and environmental and sanitation conditions, minimizes the amount of waste, and increases the family income up to 41.55%. Several waste types can be recycled and transformed into valuable products, such as energy for cooking, organic fertilizer for crops, and cattle feed for breeding. Wastewater effluent from the biogas tank can be treated by biochar and results show that it then meets the standards for irrigation purposes. Also, the waste flow from cattle breeding supplies enough nutrients to cultivate plants, and the plants grown supply are adequate food for the 30 cows living on the farm. This research shows that the use of an integrated farming system could achieve zero-emission goal. Thereby, it provides a sustainable livelihood for cattle breeding family farms. The proposed integrated cattle breeding and cultivation system improves agricultural productivity, environmental and increases the farmer income up to 41.55%.

The overuse of nitrogen (N) fertilizer for wheat is a serious problem in China, and previous studies seldom distinguish between the use of basal and topdressing N fertilizer. Data from 225 households in Jiangsu Province, China (a wheat planting area), were collected through face-to-face interviews with each head of the household. Regression models were used to study factors affecting farmers’ application of basal and topdressing N fertilizers separately. Fertilizer retailers proposed fertilizer application levels that were in opposition to their concern for the environment. Farmers’ concern for the environment only affected their application of topdressing N fertilizer and had no significant influence for use of total N fertilizer. The farmland area and amount of experience planting wheat had negative effects on basal N fertilizer use, but not on topdressing fertilizer. In the study area, the optimal strategy for decreasing N fertilizer application is designing policies to rent more farmlands to farmers with the most experience first. These farmers with their higher farm income would decrease basal N fertilizer use and the basal-topdressing ratio to improve N fertilizer use efficiency and then decrease the N fertilizer leaching into the environment.

Many nations have tended to transform their traditional growth paradigm to green growth policy paradigm to ensure environmentally sustainable development. Governments, therefore, have developed and implemented environmental protection programs to ensure environmentally sustainable development. For accelerating the transformation to green production techniques and technologies, the study aims (i) to calculate the opportunity cost of protecting environment, (ii) to estimate the production efficiency of farms, and (iii) to determine the impact of opportunity cost of protecting environment on the production efficiency in TR83 region in Turkey. Farm-level research data have been collected from totally 361 farms (334 farms participated in the environmental protection programs (EFALP) and 27 conventional farms) by using a well-structured questionnaire during the production year of 2016–2017. Minimization of total absolute deviation (MOTAD) programming model as a linearized version of QP was used to elicit the farm plans under both condition of protecting environmental and conventional farming condition. When estimating the technical, allocative, and economic efficiencies, the net farm revenue under prevailing conditions, potential net farm revenue, and optimum farm revenue were used. The net revenue difference between EFALP farm and conventional farm was attributed to the opportunity cost of protecting the environment. The impact of the opportunity cost of protecting the environment on production efficiency was explored by using two-limit Tobit model. Research results show that the opportunity cost of environmental protection is 3060 TRY per hectare and varied spatially in the research area. Government environmental support has not compensated the farmers’ revenue sacrifice completely. The technical efficiency scores of EFALP farms and conventional farms are 0.77 and 0.75, while that of allocative efficiency are 0.83 and 0.86, respectively. The economic efficiency scores of the EFALP farms and conventional farms are 0.62 and 0.63, respectively. Research results further indicate that the opportunity cost of protecting the environment can be said to have a negative impact on the economic efficiency. The variables of labor and farmland have been negatively affected the economic efficiency, while the effects of operating capital, age of operators, and family size seem positive. The study suggests creating regulatory framework providing opportunity to adjust government environmental support spatially based on the farm-level opportunity cost of protecting environment. Government practices should be developed by policymakers to supervise and control the farms participated in the environmental protection programs. Eliminating the conventional decision-making approach and replacing with environmental trade-off analysis-based decision-making techniques, involving stakeholders during the designing environmental policy, and sharing outputs of environmental trade-off analysis may increase the success of the environmental policy and programs. In addition, bringing away the goal mismatch of scientist and users by establishing bridge in between knowledge and action may increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs.

Rice fallow, a rainfed lowland agro-ecology, is presently gaining particular attention for sustainable cropping intensification in the South Asia. Nevertheless, cropping intensification of rice-fallow areas is largely challenged by non-availability of irrigation, the poor financial status of farmers and soil constraints. Indeed, fast depletion of the soil residual moisture remains the primary obstacle for growing a crop in succession in rice fallows. A field investigation was carried out to identify the most adaptable rice-winter crop rotation and to customize appropriate crop establishment practice for a winter crop that could conserve the soil moisture. Treatments comprised of three crop establishment practices for winter crops [utera (relay cropping, i.e. broadcasting of seeds in standing rice crop 15 days before harvesting), zero tillage (ZT) and ZT with mulching (ZTM)], and five post-rainy-season crops (lentil, chickpea, lathyrus, mustard and linseed). Results showed that lathyrus and lentil could be the potential winter crop in the rice-fallow condition of Eastern India. Except for mustard crop, the productivity of all the winter crops was higher in utera cropping, which was primarily attributed to early crop growth and higher soil moisture content over ZT and ZTM treatments. The higher water use efficiency was recorded under utera cropping over ZT and ZTM treatments. Higher system productivity (system rice equivalent yield) in rice–utera lathyrus (9.3 t ha⁻¹) and rice–utera lentil (8.1 t ha⁻¹) led to higher net returns and production efficiency over other treatments (winter crop × crop establishment practice). Benefits of rice residue mulching were prominent in lentil, mustard and linseed crop productivity. Energy use efficiency of different crop establishment practices follows the trend of utera > ZT > ZTM (p < 0.05), being highest in rice–utera lathyrus (5.3) followed by rice–utera lentil (4.8) crop rotations. The simulated data shows that winter crops grown under utera led to less emission of greenhouse gas (GHG) and low global warming potential (GWP) as compared to ZT and ZTM treatments. Rice–lathyrus, rice–lentil and rice–chickpea systems had lower N₂O emission than rice–mustard and rice–linseed rotations. Hence, lathyrus and lentil could be included in rice fallows ideally with utera for sustainable cropping intensification and improving the farmers’ income in Eastern India.

Under the rapid social-economic development process, the income structure and arable land size among rural households are facing with increasing differentiation in China. How the regional-scale arable land use intensity and environmental risk triggered by the rural households’ differentiation would be is a question that has not been widely discussed. To fill this research gap, this study established three step-by-step indexes, rural households’ ER index, arable land use intensity (LUI), and environmental risk index (RI), to measure rural households’ differentiation, regional arable land use intensity, and environmental risk, respectively. By gathering data from questionnaire investigation of 950 rural households in Shandong Province, China, the result showed a wide range of ER index (0.006–0.056), LUI (2748.90–6361.54), and RI (0.0966–0.5032). ER index based on farm income, nonfarm income, and arable land size among rural households showed different distributions among cities. Though huge differences of arable land use existed in different rural households, including land area, crop species, use of production materials (agro-machinery, fertilizer, pesticide), and attitude towards land transferring, the farmers’ sense of belonging to farmland and their dependence on agriculture did not disappear in the process of rural households’ differentiation. Moreover, as aggregated effects of rural households’ behavior, differentiation of regional arable land use intensity and environmental risk appeared later and lower than the level of rural households’ differentiation in the same city. Among this process, Laiwu, Weihai, and Yantai became “hotspots” with higher level of rural households’ differentiation, arable land use intensity, and agro-environmental risk, respectively. This study pointed out a possibility of policy designation that prior controlling environmental risk of arable land use could be realized by identifying the rural households’ differentiation on arable land use.

Der Autor formuliert zusammenfassende Thesen: 1. In viehstarken Regionen koennen die aus der Tierhaltung anfallenden natuerlichen Naehrstoffe bei zeitgerechter Duengung und optimaler Verteilung im Betrieb und in der Region im Pflanzenbau optimal verwertet werden. Beratung muss diese Optimierung herbeifuehren und ueberhoehten Mineralduengereinsatz abbauen. 2. Fuer den Gewaesserschutz sind langfristig groessere Flaechenmobilitaet fuer erforderlichen Strukturwandel und Existenzsicherung der Haupterwerbsbetriebe vorteilhafter als Extensivierung auf Einzelparzellen. 3. Der durchschnittliche Haupterwerbsbetrieb liegt an der unteren Einkommensgrenze, so dass Gewaesserschutzauflagen ohne ausreichende Ausgleichzahlungen seine Existenz besonders gefaehrden, wenn groessere Flaechenanteile im Betrieb betroffen sind. 4. Bei ausreichenden Ausgleichzahlungen, die auch Beschraenkungen notwendiger Entwicklungsmoeglichkeiten des Betriebes oder Vermoegensminderung beruecksichtigen, werden Landwirte auf freiwilliger Basis Gewaesserschutzmassnahmen ergreifen, die ueber eine ordnungsgemaesse Landbewirtschaftung hinausgehen. 5. Zukunftchancen haben im zukuenftig ruinoesen Wettbewerb nur intelligente Landwirte. Sie wuenschen Einkommenssteigerung und werden Existenzsicherung ihrer Betriebe nicht gegen erforderlichen Gewaesserschutz betreiben. Sie sind bei den herrschenden wirtschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen jedoch zu betrieblichem Wachstum gezwungen. Deshalb sollte der notwendige Strukturwandel allseits anerkannt werden.