Due to the episodic nature of rainfall and the high dissolved metal concentrations in the acid sulfate soil catchment of Clothiers Creek (NSW, Australia), active treatment was considered more appropriate than passive treatment. Alkaline reagents were added to oxidised shallow drains to remove acidities ranging from 438 to 1,837 mg/L CaCO₃. A fine limestone slurry was produced from the pounding together of limestone rock fragments within a rotating drum and, on addition to drain waters, was found to remove acidity to varying degrees of effectiveness (from 12 to 100%). The efficiency decreased as the pH of the water approached neutrality due to calcite saturation and the slow reaction rate of limestone at high pH. Hydrated lime powder was also mixed with drain water in the rotating drum though most mixing occurred once the slurry entered the drain where efficiencies ranging from 67 to 89% were observed. A powdered mixture of MgCO₃ and CaCO₃ was only 11% effective in treatment of the drainage water due to the slow rate of reaction of MgCO₃. Whilst the active treatment system was capable of treating a large acidity flux (particularly using hydrated lime) it required regular addition of reagent and the dosing of hydrated lime was particularly difficult to control. Future designs of this active treatment system should be automated to prevent adverse aquatic impacts due to overdosing.

The acidity of Ultisols (pH <5) is detrimental to crop production. Technologies should be explored to promote base saturation and liming effect for amelioration of Ultisol pH. Column leaching experiments were conducted to investigate the amelioration effects of canola straw (CS) and peanut straw (PS) in single treatment and in combination whether with alkaline slag (AS) or with lime on Ultisol profile acidity. The treatment without liming materials was set as control, and the AS and lime in single treatment are set for comparison. Results indicated that all the liming materials increase soil profile pH and soil exchangeable base cations at the 0–40-cm depth, except that the lime had amelioration effect just on 0 to 15-cm profile. The amelioration effect of the liming materials on surface soil acidity was mainly dependent on the ash alkalinity in organic materials or acid neutralization capacity of inorganic materials. Specific adsorption of sulfate (SO₄ ²⁻) or organic anions, decarboxylation of organic acids/anions, and the association of H⁺ with organic anions induced a “liming effect” of crop residues and AS on subsoil acidity. Moreover, SO₄ ²⁻ and chloride (Cl⁻) in PS, CS, and AS primarily induced base cations to move downward to subsoil and exchange with exchangeable aluminum (Al³⁺) and protons (H⁺). These anions also promoted the exchangeable Al to leach out of the soil profile. The CS was more effective than PS in decreasing soil acidity in the subsoil, which mainly resulted from higher sulfur (S) and Cl content in CS compared to PS. The CS combined with AS was the better amendment choice in practical agricultural systems.

It is well known that alkaline amendments could effectively decrease the bioavailability of heavy metals in soils. However, the vertical distribution of heavy metals and the nutrients enriching in amendments are little concerned during long-term field remediation. Thus, the objective of the present study was to investigate the vertical distribution and availability of Cu, Cd, Ca, and P after a 7-year field experiment. In this study, a single application of lime and apatite was conducted with the rates of 1.71–6.84 and 6.84–19.8 tons/ha, respectively. Soil pH and immobilization efficiency of Cu and Cd were both increased with increasing dosages of lime and apatite (0–50 cm). Applications of lime and apatite decreased the mobility of Cu and Cd although soil Cu and Cd in the surface soil were increased due to the input by atmospheric dry and wet deposition. Moreover, concentrations of Cu and Cd in lime- and apatite-amended soils (0–13 cm) were higher than those in the control group. However, applications of lime and apatite decreased the downward eluviations of heavy metals in soils (13–50 cm). For soil nutrients, the Ca concentrations at 0–13 and 13–30 cm were both enhanced with increasing amendment dosages, while only soil P concentration at 0–13 cm was increased in apatite-treated soils and majority of them presented in stable-P. In addition, resin-P was increased with increasing dosages of the apatite, which suggested that high eutrophication risk was induced by excessive P loss. Thus, more attention should be paid to the nutrients (phosphorus) and pollutants enriching in the amendments during in-situ remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils.

Surface liming even in higher doses did not affected soil Ph and improving the content of Mg and Ca was only temporary. Spot fertilization by fine-ground amphibolite is significant particularly from the aspect of long-term affects. Short-term affects manifested themselves slightly but in the whole system of particular parameters. Application of higher amounts (3 kg.ha-1) of amphibolite has its substantiation in the future.