细化搜索
结果 1-10 的 12
Social capital in rural areas and the demand for land consolidation measures
2015
Dudzinska, M., University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (Poland) | Kocur-Bera, K., University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (Poland) | Kowalczyk, C., University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (Poland)
Spatial modifications should be introduced in areas where members of the local community actively participate in consolidation projects. Social acceptance is the key prerequisite for successful land consolidation. How should the sequence of land consolidation measures be planned in a rural area whose inhabitants have not expressed their opinions about the project? Are the existing criteria, which are applied to evaluate land consolidation measures mostly in agricultural regions, sufficient? Scientists and practitioners have been developing criteria that should be taken into account in the process of planning land consolidation measures. This article analyzes the criteria for planning land consolidation measures in Poland. Most of them are based on economic parameters, such as farm fragmentation, average land plot area, average farm area, shape of farm fields, proportion of plot sides. A criterion that is disregarded in the planning process is the local community’s attitude to the undertaking. This article attempts to define additional criteria for planning land consolidation measures based on the local community’s attitude to the project. The study was carried out in the Lublin Region, which is characterized by the highest number of land consolidation schemes in Poland. Attempts were made to describe social activity levels in the region’s rural municipalities. The selection of variables characterizing the local community was a key stage of the study. Variables that were indirectly indicative of social activity were included in the analysis: voter turnout in elections, municipal councilors’ level of education, number of non-governmental organizations, and number of local action groups.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]Future directions for shifting cultivation
2001
Freeman, J. (International Inst. of Rural Reconstruction, Silang, Cavite (Philippines))
Principles of extension for sustainability: people-centered agricultural development
2001
Bunch, R. (COSECHA Apartado 3586, Tegucigalpa, Honduras (Central America))
Community-based forest management in the Philippines: evolution, lessons, and challenges
2001
Austria, I.V. (Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Visayas Ave., Diliman, Quezon City (Philippines). Forest Management Bureau)
Catalyzing innovation in shifting cultivation communities: experiences from Palawan, Philippines
2001
Raintree, J. (Forestry Research Center, NAFRI (Scc Natura/SIDA) Scc Natura, P.O. Box 4298 Vientiane (Lao PDR))
Community level planning for resource management
2001
Freeman, J. (Internationl Inst. of Rural Reconstruction, Silang, Cavite (Philippines))
Participatory on-farm experimentation and evaluation
2001
Coe, R. | Verbist, B.
Participatory assessment strategies for extension and training in Melanesian communities
2001
Jansen, T. | Kabu, R.
Traditional rotational farming system of the Karen people in Thailand
2001
Trakansuphakon, P. (252 Moo 2T. Sansaimoi A. Sansai, Chiang Mai 50210 (Thailand))
Domestication and cultivation of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in the uplands of Asia
2001
Karki, M. (International Development Research Center Canada House 208 Jor Bagh, New Delhi 11003 (India)) Parajuli, D.
