细化搜索
结果 71-80 的 88
Institutional capacity for designing and implementing agricultural and rural development policies and strategies in Nigeria
2009
Adebayo, Kolawole | Babu, Suresh Chandra | Rhoe, Valerie
This study assessed the capacity for designing and implementing agricultural and rural development policies, strategies, and programs in Nigeria. Data for this study were derived from initial consultations at the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (FMAWR), Federal Ministry of Women affairs and Social Development (FMWASD), and the Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) early in 2008. Two consultation workshops were also held, one for relevant staff in the ministries, parastatals, and NGOs; and the other for relevant university professors and researchers. This was followed by a review of relevant literature and a more detailed survey of institutions and individuals. A sample of relevant institutions and individuals were purposively selected from the Federal Capital, Abuja, Oyo, Kaduna, Enugu Ogun, Benue, and Abia States. At each location, trained data collectors compiled a list of state and federal agencies, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and universities where 32 institutional questionnaires were administered, of which 29 were valid for further analysis. Similarly, 320 individual questionnaires were administered, of which 183 were valid for further analysis. The null hypothesis that job satisfaction and institutional incentive was independent of selected background information (gender, position, years spent on job, nature of institution, and level of formal education) of the experts was tested using the Chi square analysis. The respondents were mostly male (23 of 24) and were either heads of departments (10 of 24) or directors, their deputies and their equivalents (12 of 24). Most of the respondents (22 of 24) exhibited an indifferent perception to the general environment and processes involved in policymaking. Reported capacity- strengthening efforts (for 13 of the 24 institutions surveyed) amounted to an average cost of US$76.98 per person per day for the 1-3 weeks training provided. While the practice of strategic planning was widespread, mission statements were widely used in only two-fifths of selected institutions; near-term strategies were widely used in about one third; and long-term visions were widely used in a little more than one third. Even the practice of participation in planning from a broad range of personnel within the institution was only widely used in one third of the selected intuitions. Similarly, written guidelines were widely available (22 of 24), but fully disseminated in less than half of the selected institutions. However, respondents claimed that the financial guidelines were being followed strictly, but half of the respondents (12 of 24) did not know the frequency of receiving reports from the accounting system. Most of the selected institutions had both a human resource management unit (70.8 percent) and dedicated staff training centers (54.2 percent), but about half of the respondents neither knew the regularity of review of staff training needs nor when last staff training needs were assessed. The implication of this is that the extent to which the training exercises match the skill gaps of staff and capacity requirements of the institutions were unknown. Between 75–80 percent of the selected institutions engaged in some collaborative programs and linkages with other government institutions, relevant NGOs, international development partners, training institutions, and research institutions. These collaborative ventures worked mainly through cost sharing, exchange, joint engagements, and sharing of reports. Over 70 percent of the individual respondents (experts) had at least a Master of Science (MSc) or its equivalent. The majority (79.7 percent) were male who had spent more than 10 years on the job. About half of the experts worked with universities, compared to 13.1 percent in the ministries and 37.7 percent in parastatals. Their expertise cut across a broad range of subjects relevant for designing and implementing agricultural and rural development policies— more than one quarter were experts in agricultural economics, extension, communication, rural development, and rural sociology. The most frequently mentioned (51.4 percent) person responsible for agricultural and rural development programs, policies, and strategies was the officer-in-charge, but the list of stakeholders was long and varied. Over 60 percent of the respondents stated that at least some consultation was done with stakeholders through face-to-face communication at stakeholder fora, meetings, conferences, summits, and talks. According to the respondents, the major concerns of stakeholders about agricultural and rural development policies, programs, or strategies were the extent to which they achieve stated goals. More than half of the respondents claimed that research evidence such as the achievements of previous and on going programs, results of fresh surveys, and extension and On farm Adaptive Research (OFAR) reports were used to support the development of agricultural and rural strategies, policies, and programs. This evidence was obtained mainly from agricultural institutions and universities as well as available reports, journals, and publications. The respondents stated that the major sources of funds for the process of agricultural and rural development policy were the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN), The World Bank, state and local governments, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). They also stated that the various agricultural and rural development policies, strategies, and programs largely benefited the poor (52.5 percent). It was noteworthy that respondents preceived that the number of women at the ministerial and research levels of agricultural and rural development was less than 1 percent. Even at the level of rural farming communities, only 15.3 percent of the respondents felt that there were more women. Furthermore, only 27.4 percent of the experts incorporated environmental issues in their work and only 20.4 percent undertook environmental analysis in their work. Finally, 91.3 percent were indifferent to their job, meaning that it would be difficult for them to perform to the best of their abilities without allowing them greater freedom in the performance of their jobs and work out a reasonable and acceptable reward package for the job done. The results of the Chi square tests showed that the experts’ perception of job satisfaction and institutional incentives is independent of all the background variables considered. The main capacity gaps for designing and implementing agricultural and rural development policies in Nigeria included 1) the need to entrench democratic principles and transparent leadership and 2) to bridge the gap between universities, research institutions, and policymaking and implementing entities. There was also a limited understanding of the relationships between institutional, human, and material resources versus impact of policy on target end-users at every level in the policy design, planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Finally, there was a need for the institutionalization of effective measures for tracking changes in the role of evidence in strategic, gender-sensitive planning, through regular monitoring and evaluation, impact assessment, adequate documentation, and commitment to utilize the results of the exercise. Efforts should also be targeted towards improving the quality, gender sensitivity, timeliness, and circulation of policy-relevant evidence.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]Empowering smallholder producers in integrated agricultural research for development in Lake Kivu 全文
2009
Pali, Pamela N. | Njuki, Jemimah | Buruchara, Robin Arani | Chiuri, Wanjiku L. | Tenywa, M.M. | Mugabe, J | Adekunle, A.A.
Cooperative approaches for implementation of dairy manure digesters 全文
2009
Liebrand, Carolyn | Ling, K. Charles
Sustainable land management through market oriented commodity development: Case studies from Ethiopia 全文
2009
Gebremedhin, Berhanu | Woldewahid, G. | Dessalegn, Yigsaw | Gebey, T. | Teka, W.
GIS based gap analysis as a tool for biodiversity conservation optimisation: the IITA cowpea collection
2009
Rysavy, A. | Dumet, D. | Sonder, Kai | Sauerborn, J.
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata(L.) Walp.) is an important grain legume cultivated in most tropical and some temperate regions. It is one of the most widely adapted, versatile grain legumes of high nutritious value. Cowpea production across Africa accounts for approx.91 % of world output. Cowpea has an impact on nutrition as valuable protein source and livelihoods of small scale farmers and plays a key role in the life of many people, especially in developing countries. The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, holds the largest cowpea germplasm collection worldwide. Many literature sources cite that biodiversity is constantly diminishing and exposed to different hazards accelerating the speed of biodiversity loss. To avoid future losses of cowpea genetic diversity it is important to assess the cowpea accession collection at IITA to get an overview about the current conservation status and to guide future sampling. For the present study a gap analysis is an evaluation technique to estimate the degree of coverage of already sampled regions, to identify regions that need additional sampling and those where no collections have been performed yet. First the country coverage of georeferenced cowpea accession was estimated. Then Eco geographical site descriptors (temperature, precipitation, length of growing period, altitude) were extracted to deter-mine areas with environmental conditions favoured by cowpea. Afterwards regions with similar environmental conditions were identified by using GIS techniques to predict areas where the possibility of filling gaps in the collection is most likely. Furthermore, this study used the spatial analysis tools FloraMapTM, HomologueTM,ArcGISTMand DIVA-GIS to identify potential areas for future conservation activities of cowpea. The geographical scope of the present study was focused on sub-Saharan Africa. Results indicated that cowpea can be found approx. between 15◦N and 20◦S. With respect to new collections main focus should be put on countries where so fare no collections have been done, but where the spatial analysis showed high probability of encountering cowpea —Burundi, Eritrea, Equatorial-Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Namibia and Rwanda respectively. In countries with few georeferenced accessions, existing no georeferenced passport data need to be complemented or new sampling should be carried out.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]Inventorying diversity, use and conservation status of indigenous fruit and nut species of Nepal for developing 'conservation through use' strategies 全文
2009
Joshi, N. | Maass, Brigitte L. | Kehlenbeck, K.
Selecting a cooperative membership structure for the agriculture-of-the-middle initiative 全文
2009
Fluid milk and butter production and marketing systems in Fogera District, Amhara Region, Ethiopia 全文
2009
Anteneh, B. | Tegegne, Azage | Beyene, F. | Gebremedhin, Berhanu
Impact of forage fodder bank adoption on labour use for feeding cattle of smallholder households in Prey Chhor District, Kampong Cham Province, Cambodia 全文
2009
Soem, D | Boupha, T. | Stür, Werner W. | Seng, M.
How does traditional harvesting of young leaves for vegetable use affect seed yields of cowpea variety mixtures in Eastern Uganda? 全文
2009
Okonya, J. | Omadi, R | Polreich, S | Maass, Brigitte L.