细化搜索
结果 1-5 的 5
Water for Food for a world without hunger (FAOWATER)
2012
Water for Food for world without hunger (FAOWATER)
2009
Water for food. For a world without hunger (FAOWATER)
2012
FAO, Rome (Italy). Natural Resources Management and Environment Dept. eng
2012 Global Hunger Index. The challenge of hunger: Ensuring sustainable food security under land, water, and energy stresses 全文
2012
K. von Grebmer
The 2012 GHI report focuses particularly on the issue of how to ensure sustainable food security under conditions of water, land, and energy stress. Demographic changes, rising incomes and associated consumption patterns, and climate change, alongside persistent poverty and inadequate policies and institutions, are all placing serious pressure on natural resources.In this report, IFPRI describes the evidence on land, water, and energy scarcity in developing countries and offers two visions of a future global food system - an unsustainable scenario in which current trends in resource use continue, and a sustainable scenario in which access to food, modern energy, and clean water improves significantly and ecosystem degradation is halted or reversed. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe provide on-the-ground perspectives on the issues of land tenure and title as well as the impacts of scarce land, water, and energy on poor people in Sierra Leone and Tanzania.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]Food–Energy–Water Crises in the United States and China: Commonalities and Asynchronous Experiences Support Integration of Global Efforts 全文
2021
Zhuang, Jie | Sun, Huihui | Sayler, Gary | Kline, Keith L. | Dale, Virginia H. | Jin, Mingzhou | Yu, Guirui | Fu, Bojie | Loeffler, Frank E.
Food, energy, and water (FEW) systems have been recognized as an issue of critical global importance. Understanding the mechanisms that govern the FEW nexus is essential to develop solutions and avoid humanitarian crises of displacement, famine, and disease. The U.S. and China are the world’s leading economies. Although the two nations are shaped by fundamentally different political and economic systems, they share FEW trajectories in several complementary ways. These realities place the U.S. and China in unique positions to engage in problem definition, dialogue, actions, and transdisciplinary convergence of research to achieve productive solutions addressing FEW challenges. By comparing the nexus and functions of the FEW systems in the two nations, this perspective aims to facilitate collaborative innovations that reduce disciplinary silos, mitigate FEW challenges, and enhance environmental sustainability. The review of experiences and challenges facing the U.S. and China also offers valuable insights for other nations seeking to achieve sustainable development goals.
显示更多 [+] 显示较少 [-]