Tourism places and destinations – identification and interrelations with administrative boundaries | Tūrisma vietas un galamērķi, to identificēšana un saistība ar administratīvo teritoriju
2010
Klepers, A., Vidzemes Augstskola, Valmiera (Latvia);University of Latvia, Riga (Latvia). Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences | Rozite, M., University of Latvia, Riga (Latvia). Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences;School of Business Administration Turiba, Riga (Latvia)
إنجليزي. With Latvia's turn towards market economy two decades before, tourism has increasingly gained currency as an agent for regional economic development. This paper investigates the changes of the system of organization of tourism place promotion after the recently completed administrative-territorial reform. The problem becomes topical because of the lack of discussion on different spatial structures of tourism in the Latvian language. Analyzing domestic tourism, what are the relations between a tourism place, a tourism destination, and an administrative unit? This paper reports on identified differences between tourist demands and the system of organization of tourism. Travellers find administrative boundaries insignificant, whereas places are almost always promoted according to the administrative boundaries of the counties.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]لاتفيا. Rakstā autori analizē tūrisma vietas saistību ar jēdzienu “galamērķis” un teritoriāli administratīvajām vienībām. Kā identificēt tūrisma vietu un cik lielai tai jābūt, lai tai piemērotu galamērķa mārketingu – vai tas sakrīt ar administratīvajām teritorijām? Problēmu aktualizē nepietiekama terminoloģijas apspriešana latviešu valodā un administratīvi teritoriālā reforma valstī. Tūrisma vietas pārdošanas sistēma lielākoties ir organizēta administratīvo teritoriju robežās, tomēr ceļotāji administratīvās robežas ignorē un uztver tūrisma vietu savādāk.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]