خيارات البحث
النتائج 1 - 3 من 3
New insight on chlamydiae
2023
Szymańska-Czerwińska Monika | Zaręba-Marchewka Kinga | Niemczuk Krzysztof
This article provides an overview of the current knowledge on chlamydiae, which are intracellular bacteria belonging to the Chlamydiaceae family. Whole-genome sequencing leads to great increases in the available data about Chlamydia spp. Recently, novel chlamydial taxons in various hosts living in different environments have been recognised. New species and taxons with Candidatus status have been recorded mainly in birds and reptiles. Chlamydia gallinacea is an emerging infectious agent in poultry with indirectly confirmed zoonotic potential. Recently, a new group of avian C. abortus strains with worldwide distribution in various wild bird families has been described. The definition of C. abortus species became outdated with the discovery of these strains and has been amended. It now includes two subgroups, mammalian and avian, the latter including all isolates hitherto referred to as atypical C. psittaci or C. psittaci/C. abortus intermediates.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]Chlamydiae – what’s new?
2020
Zaręba-Marchewka, Kinga | Szymańska-Czerwińska, Monika | Niemczuk, Krzysztof
This paper provides an overview of the current knowledge of chlamydiae. These intracellular microorganisms belonging to the Chlamydiaceae family are widely distributed throughout the world. Constant development of culture-independent approaches for characterisation of microbial genomes enables new discoveries in the field of Chlamydia. The number of new taxa is continuously increasing as well as the range of hosts. New species and genotypes are constantly being discovered, particularly new avian and reptilian agents, which are discussed in this article. Interestingly, wild animals are the main hosts for new Chlamydia species including different species of bird, turtle and snake. The availability of next-generation sequencing opens up a new prospect for research and leads to deeper knowledge of these interesting microorganisms about which much is still to discover.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]Brucellosis and chlamydiosis seroprevalence in goats at livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zimbabwe
2019
Bhandi, Solomon(University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership) | Pfukenyi, Davies M.(University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership) | Matope, Gift(Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership ,University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies) | Murondoti, Absolom(University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies) | Tivapasi, Musavengana(University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership) | Ndengu, Masimba(University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership) | Scacchia, Massimo(The Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Abruzzo and Molise) | Bonfini, Barbara(The Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Abruzzo and Molise) | de Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel(Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership ,Kasetsart University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine)
In Zimbabwe, there have been no chlamydiosis and limited brucellosis studies in goats. This study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors of the two diseases in goats at three different livestock-wildlife interface areas: porous, non-porous and non-interface in the south-eastern lowveld of Zimbabwe. Collected sera (n = 563) were tested for Brucella antibodies using the Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and the complement fixation test (CFT); and for Chlamydia abortus antibodies using the CFT. All tested goats were negative for Brucella antibodies. Overall, chlamydial seroprevalence was 22%. The porous [c² = 9.6, odds ratio (OR) = 2.6, p = 0.002] and non-porous (c² = 37.5, OR = 5.8, p < 0.00001) interfaces were approximately three and six times more likely to be chlamydial seropositive than the non-interface area, respectively. Chlamydial seroprevalence was not associated with sex (c² = 0.5, OR = 1.2, p = 0.5), abortion history in female goats (c² = 0.7, OR = 1.3, p = 0.4), keeping goats with cattle (c² = 0.2, OR = 1.5, p = 0.7) or flock size (c² = 0.03, OR = 1.4, p = 0.9). Our study provides the first serological evidence of chlamydiosis in goats in Zimbabwe and the results suggest that proximity to wildlife is associated with increased chlamydial seropositivity. Further studies are required to determine the role of chlamydial infection on goat reproductive failure and that of wildlife on C. abortus transmission to domestic ruminants.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]