Plant dispersal syndromes are unreliable, especially for predicting zoochory and long‐distance dispersal | Les syndrômes de dispersion des plantes ne sont pas fiables, en particulier pour prédire la zoochorie et la dispersion à longue distance
2022
Green, Andy | Baltzinger, Christophe | Lovas‐kiss, Ádám | Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD) ; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas = Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) | Ecosystèmes forestiers (UR EFNO) ; Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Danube Research Institute ; Centre for Ecological Research [Budapest] ; Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE)-Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA)-Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE)-Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA) | This research was supported by Spanish National Plan project CGL2016-76067-P (AEI/FEDER, EU to AJG), the Thematic Research Network ‘Habitats and Diversity in Centre Val de Loire Region’ (to CB), a János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and the New National Excellence Programme of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology ÚNKP-20-5-DE-225, NKFIH OTKA FK-127939 and KH-129520 grants (ÁLK).
Early Access : JUN 2021
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]International audience
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]Inglés. Plant dispersal syndromes are allocated based on diaspore morphology and used to predict the dominant mechanisms of dispersal. Many authors assume that only angiosperms with endozoochory, epizoochory or anemochory syndromes have a long-distance dispersal (LDD) mechanism. Too much faith is often placed in classical syndromes to explain historical dispersal events and to predict future ones. What is usually recorded as the 'endozoochory syndrome' is in reality a 'frugivory syndrome' and this has often diverted attention from endozoochory by non-frugivores (e.g. waterbirds and large herbivores) that disperse a broad range of angiosperms, for which they likely provide the maximum dispersal distances. Neither the endozoochory nor the epizoochory syndromes provide helpful predictions of which plants non-frugivores disperse, or by which mechanism. We combined data from previous studies to show that only 4% of European plant species dispersed by ungulate endozoochory belong to the corresponding syndrome, compared to 36% for ungulate epizoochory and 8% for endozoochory by migratory ducks. In contrast, the proportions of these species that are assigned to an 'unassisted syndrome' are 37, 31 and 28%, respectively. Since allocated syndromes do not adequately account for zoochory, empirical studies often fail to find the expected relationship between syndromes and LDD events such as those underlying the colonization of islands or latitudinal migration rates. We need full incorporation of existing zoochory data into dispersal databases, and more empirical research into the relationship between plant traits and the frequency and effectiveness of different dispersal mechanisms (paying attention to unexpected vectors). Acknowledging the broad role of non-frugivores in facilitating LDD is crucial to improve predictions of the consequences of global change, such as how plant distributions respond to climate change, and how alien plants spread. Networks of dispersal interactions between these vertebrates and plants are a vital but understudied part of the Web of Life.
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]Palabras clave de AGROVOC
Información bibliográfica
Este registro bibliográfico ha sido proporcionado por Institut national de la recherche agronomique