Prediction of starch amylose content versus total grain amylose content in corn by near-infrared transmittance spectroscopy

A study was conducted to investigate methods of improving a near-infrared transmittance spectroscopy (NITS) amylose calibration that could serve as a rapid, nondestructive alternative to traditional methods for determining amylose content in corn. Calibrations were developed using a set of genotypes possessing endosperm mutations in single- and double-mutant combinations ranging in starch-amylose content (SAC) from -8.5 to 76%, relative to a standard curve. The influence of three factors were examined including comparing calibrations made against SAC versus grain amylose content (GAC), developing calibrations using partial least squares (PLS) analysis versus artificial neural networking (ANN), and using all samples in the calibrations set versus using progressively narrower ranges of SAC or GAC in the calibration set. Grain samples were divided into calibration and validation sets for PLS analysis while samples used in ANN were assigned to a training set, test set, and validation set. Performance statistics of the validation sets that were considered were the coefficient of determination (R), the standard error of prediction (SEP), and the ratio of the standard deviation of amylose values to the SEP (RPD), which were used to compare all NITS models. The study revealed an NITS prediction model for SAC (R = 0.96, SEP = 5.1%, RDP = 3.8) of similar precision to the best GAC model (R = 0.96, SEP = 2.7%, RPD = 3.5). Narrowing the amylose range of the calibration set generally did not improve performance statistics except for PLS models for SAC in which a decrease in SEP values was observed. In one model, the SEP improved while R and RPD remained constant (R = 0.94, SEP = 4.2%, RPD = 2.8) when samples with SAC values < 20% were removed from the calibration set. Although the NITS amylose calibrations in this study are of limited precision, they may be useful when a rough screening method is needed for SAC. For example, NITS may be useful to detect severe contamination during transport and storage of specialty grains or to aid breeders when selecting for amylose content from large numbers of grain samples.