Twenty-four 10-month-old Polled Hereford heifers were inoculated sc with live cells of one of the following strains of Brucella abortus: S19 delta 31K (n = 4), S19 delta SOD (n = 4), RB51 (n = 4), and strain 19 (n = 6); controls (n = 6) were given saline solution. Heifers given the deletion mutants S19 delta 31K and S19 delta SOD, and those given strain 19 developed antibody responses to B abortus and cutaneous reactions to brucellin. Heifers given strain RB51 did not develop antibodies that reacted in the standard tube agglutination test, but sera reacted in tests, using an antibody dot-blot assay containing RB51 antigen. The S19 delta 31K and S19 delta SOD strains of B abortus isolated from lymph node tissue after vaccination did not differ genetically from the master stock strain. All heifers were bred naturally at 16 to 17 months of age, and were challenge-exposed intraconjunctivally with virulent B abortus strain 2308 during the fifth month of pregnancy. All vaccinated heifers were protected (ie, none aborted and none had B abortus isolated from their tissues after parturition). Calves born from vaccinated dams were free of B abortus. Antibody responses in heifers after challenge exposure were an indicator of immunity. All 5 control heifers (nonvaccinated) developed serum antibodies after challenge exposure; 3 aborted, and 1 delivered a small, weak calf at 8.5 months of gestation. Thus, live mutant strains of B abortus can induce protective immunity when given at 10 months of age, and strain RB51 is a strong candidate for further testing.

An ELISA, using hot saline solution extracts (HSS) of a less-mucoid variant (M -) strain of Brucella canis as antigen, was developed for detection of antibodies against B canis in dogs. The test was applied to 177 field serum samples previously tested by use of the 2-mercaptoethanol rapid slide agglutination test, 2- mercaptoethanol-tube agglutination test, and agar gel -immunodiffusion containing HSS and cytoplasmic antigens of B canis. Results indicated that this ELISA seems to be highly specific (95.6%) and slightly less sensitive (93.8%). The HSS obtained from B canis wild-type RM 6/66 also have been used, but in our study, it seemed to be unsuitable for use in ELISA because of the high background values observed for sera with negative test results.