The adverse effects of air emissions from animal feeding operations (AFOs) on public health, environment, and quality-of-life have been well-documented. Regulations or lawsuits may force AFOs to reduce their air emissions. Since livestock barn particulate matter (PM) has relatively high particle density and diameter and many gasses adsorb onto PM, its filtration might reduce air emissions. A porous windbreak wall that imposes acceptable backpressure (< 12.5 Pa) and covers the fan could be a promising option. Seventy-two different porous windbreak wall scenarios were modeled to compare their backpressure on the fan as well as average airspeed over the ground. These scenarios were combinations of shape (box, chamfered, curved), size (lengths of 2, 2.5, and 3 fan diameters), presence or absence of an opening (opened and closed), screen porosity (mosquito screen or clean screen, SunBlocker 70% or clogged screen), and fan angle and height. Backpressure and airspeed decreased with increasing windbreak wall length. Generally, the box-shaped windbreak wall had lower backpressure and airspeeds than the other shapes. The increased backpressure with clogged screen even at two fan diameters (2d) was acceptable. The tilted fan commonly used in poultry houses had higher backpressure and airspeed over the ground than the non-tilted fan used in swine houses due to the former’s lower surface area and tilt towards the ground. Overall, taking into account cost considerations and footprint size (for retrofittability), despite its higher airspeed over the ground (vs. larger footprints) and modest reduction in airflow rate, the 2d, open box model seems the most promising option.

Poultry houses emit large amounts of pollutants, e.g., ammonia and particulate matter (PM), that can affect public health, environment, and quality-of-life, due to odor. Poultry producers need low-cost and low-pressure treatments that can be compatible with existing ventilation systems. The porous windbreak wall coupled with a vegetative strip seems promising as it dissipates exhaust gases and traps PM (as well as adsorbed gases) on the screen, soil surface, as well as in the vegetation. Different windbreak wall-vegetative strip system designs were evaluated to treat the exhaust from 0.9-m fans in two types of layer house, for their abilities to reduce pollutant and odor emissions. The porous chamfered-shape windbreak wall with a footprint length of 3 fan diameters proved the most effective in reducing emissions. Even with a low system pressure of ~ 5 Pa, it greatly reduced odor, by 79% at 10 m and 59% at 5 m. It reduced TSP emissions moderately, by an average of 41%, while ammonia emissions were reduced slightly (by 21%). The chamfered screen was more readily cleaned by rainfall given the sticky nature of poultry house exhaust than the vertical screen. Overall, this low-cost, retrofittable, and modular system with a small footprint could be used by layer producers and, probably, by other poultry producers to reduce their emissions, alone or in combination with other mitigation methods to obtain greater reduction in emissions.

Air emissions from animal feeding operations (AFOs) can affect public health, environment, and quality of life. Although regulations or lawsuits may force AFOs to reduce air emissions, treatment options are limited and expensive. Trapping particulate matter (PM) emitted from AFOs is important for reducing emissions since many odorous and environmentally important gases are also transported on PM. Since PM emitted by AFOs have relatively high particle density and diameter, its partial filtration might be feasible and effective in reducing air emission. A porous windbreak wall made of lumber and mosquito screen, coupled with a vegetative strip of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) covering three fans, was evaluated in a tunnel-ventilated swine finishing barn. The system imposed acceptable pressure on the fan (< 13 Pa) and was readily cleaned by rain. The system reduced total suspended particulate (TSP) emission moderately (average reduction of 28%), while reduction in ammonia emissions was low. Odor 10 m downstream of the fans was reduced greatly by 71%. Soil inside the system and vegetation accumulated appreciable amounts of nitrogen and sulfur; the vegetation also trapped appreciable amounts of PM. Overall, this low-cost, retrofittable, and modular system could be used by swine farmers to reduce their emissions, alone or in combination with other mitigation methods to obtain greater reduction in emissions.

Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera) is widely grown in the deserts. This herb is commercially used because it is rich in saponins and phenolic compounds with antioxidant effect. Y. schidigera or its derivatives are included as nontoxic food supplements, in cosmetics, and in the pharmaceutical industry. Saponins originated from Y. schidigera have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunostimulatory, growth promoter, hypocholesterolemic, and hypoglycemic effects. To date, the key role of Y. schidigera or its products in animal nutrition is to reduce the ammonia content in the atmosphere and fecal odor in poultry excreta. Mitigating ammonia by using this plant could be achieved by the modification of gut microbiota, enhancement in digestion, and absorption of nutrients, leading to a better growth and production performance of animals and poultry. Various methods were applied to mitigate the emission of odor from the litter by different strategies including biofilters, litter treatments, air scrubbers, neutralizing agents, windbreak walls, etc., but these techniques are expensive. This article provides a new insight to scientists and poultry breeders to use Y. schidigera plant or its products as inexpensive and safe sources of a feed supplement to overcome the ammonia and fecal odor problems, as well as reduce environmental pollution in poultry houses.

Natural windbreaks have been planted around livestock shelters to improve odour dispersion without substantial knowledge of their best implementation practices. Using three groups of four trained panellists and an odour generator, the objective of the present research was to measure and compare the length of odour plumes (LOP) produced in the field in the absence of, and in the presence of four natural windbreaks exposed to various climatic conditions. During 39 mornings in August, September and December 2003, panellists observed the resulting odour plumes using hedonic tone (HT) as scale and in the afternoon, evaluated the odour concentration (OC) of the odorous air sampled at the generator. By correlating HT with to their corresponding OC, filed HT values were converted into OC units, and 2 OU m⁻³ contours were used to establish LOP. A multiple factor analysis verified the effect significance on LOP of the presence of a windbreak, of windbreak properties and of climatic conditions. While being diluted, OC decreased exponentially with HT as observed by panellists (P < 0.05). Secondly, the windbreaks significantly reduced LOP by 22% as compared to the site without a windbreak. Thirdly, the denser windbreaks had a greater impact on reducing LOP. The LOP of windbreaks with an optical porosity of 0.55 was not significantly different compared to that created in the absence of a windbreak. The wind speed, direction and ambient temperature had a strong influence on LOP while atmospheric stability, windbreak position downwind from the odour source within 60 m and odour emission rate had little impact, based on the analysis of 36 field tests in the presence of a windbreak.