The aim of this study was to identify primary flow paths involved in the chlordecone (CLD) river contamination and quantify the CLD fluxes to assess CLD pollution levels and duration according to a typical catchment of the banana cropping area in the French Indies (Guadeloupe): the Pérou Catchment (12 km2) characterized by heavy rainfall (5686 mm year?1). Three sub-catchments (SC1, SC2 and SC3) were studied during the hydrological year 2009–2010: a pedological survey combined with a spatialized hydrochemical approach was conducted. The average soil concentration is higher in the Pérou Catchment (3400 ?g kg?1) than in the entire banana cropping area in Guadeloupe (2100 ?g kg?1). The results showed that CLD stocks in soils vary largely among soil types and farming systems: the weakest stocks are located upstream in SC1 (5 kg ha?1), where a majority of the area is non-cultivated; medium stocks are located in Nitisols downstream in SC3 (9 kg ha?1); and the greatest stocks are observed in SC2 on Andosols (12 kg ha?1) characterized by large farms. The annual water balance and the hydro-chemical analysis revealed that the three sub-catchments exhibited different behaviors. Pérou River contamination was high during low flows, which highlighted that contamination primarily originated from groundwater contributions. The results showed that only a small part of the catchment (SC2), contributing little to the water flow, comprises a major CLD contribution, which is in agreement with the highly contaminated andosol soils observed there. Another significant result considers that at least 50 years would be required to export the totality of the actual CLD soil stocks retained in the topsoil layer. The actual time for soil remediation will however be much longer considering (i) the necessary time for the chlordecone to percolate and be stored in the shallow aquifers and (ii) its travel time to reach the river. (Résumé d'auteur)

The aim of this study was to identify primary flow paths involved in the chlordecone (CLD) river contamination and quantify the CLD fluxes to assess CLD pollution levels and duration according to a typical catchment of the banana cropping area in the French Indies (Guadeloupe): the Perou Catchment (12 km(2)) characterized by heavy rainfall (5686 mm year(-1)). Three sub-catchments (SC1, SC2 and SC3) were studied during the hydrological year 2009-2010: a pedological survey combined with a spatialized hydrochemical approach was conducted. The average soil concentration is higher in the Perou Catchment (3400 mu g kg(-1)) than in the entire banana cropping area in Guadeloupe (2100 mu g kg(-1)). The results showed that CLD stocks in soils vary largely among soil types and farming systems: the weakest stocks are located upstream in SC1 (5 kg ha(-1)), where a majority of the area is non-cultivated; medium stocks are located in Nitisols downstream in SC3 (9 kg ha(-1)); and the greatest stocks are observed in SC2 on Andosols (12 kg ha(-1)) characterized by large farms. The annual water balance and the hydro-chemical analysis revealed that the three sub-catchments exhibited different behaviors. Perou River contamination was high during low flows, which highlighted that contamination primarily originated from groundwater contributions. The results showed that only a small part of the catchment (SC2), contributing little to the water flow, comprises a major CLD contribution, which is in agreement with the highly contaminated andosol soils observed there. Another significant result considers that at least 50 years would be required to export the totality of the actual CLD soil stocks retained in the topsoil layer. The actual time for soil remediation will however be much longer considering (i) the necessary time for the chlordecone to percolate and be stored in the shallow aquifers and (ii) its travel time to reach the river.rights reserved.

Chlordecone was applied between 1972 and 1993 in banana fields of the French West Indies. This resulted in long-term pollution of soils and contamination of waters, aquatic biota, and crops. To assess pollution level and duration according to soil type, WISORCH, a leaching model based on first-order desorption kinetics, was developed and run. Its input parameters are soil organic carbon content (SOC) and SOC/water partitioning coefficient (Koc). It accounts for current chlordecone soil contents and drainage water concentrations. The model was valid for andosol, which indicates that neither physicochemical nor microbial degradation occurred. Dilution by previous deep tillages makes soil scrapping unrealistic.Lixiviation appeared the main way to reduce pollution. Besides the SOC and rainfall increases, Koc increased from nitisol to ferralsol and then andosol while lixiviation efficiency decreased. Consequently, pollution is bound to last for several decades for nitisol, centuries for ferralsol, and half a millennium for andosol.

Chlordecone was applied between 1972 and 1993 in banana fields of the French West Indies. This resulted in long-term pollution of soils and contamination of waters, aquatic biota, and crops. To assess pollution level and duration according to soil type, WISORCH, a leaching model based on first-order desorption kinetics, was developed and run. Its input parameters are soil organic carbon content (SOC) and SOC/water partitioning coefficient (Koc). It accounts for current chlordecone soil contents and drainage water concentrations. The model was valid for andosol, which indicates that neither physicochemical nor microbial degradation occurred. Dilution by previous deep tillages makes soil scrapping unrealistic.Lixiviation appeared the main way to reduce pollution. Besides the SOC and rainfall increases, Koc increased from nitisol to ferralsol and then andosol while lixiviation efficiency decreased. Consequently, pollution is bound to last for several decades for nitisol, centuries for ferralsol, and half a millennium for andosol.

Chlordecone was applied between 1972 and 1993 in banana fields of the French West Indies. This resulted in long-term pollution of soils and contamination of waters, aquatic biota, and crops. To assess pollution level and duration according to soil type, WISORCH, a leaching model based on first-order desorption kinetics, was developed and run. Its input parameters are soil organic carbon content (SOC) and SOC/water partitioning coefficient (Koc). It accounts for current chlordecone soil contents and drainage water concentrations. The model was valid for andosol, which indicates that neither physico-chemical nor microbial degradation occurred. Dilution by previous deep tillages makes soil scrapping unrealistic. Lixiviation appeared the main way to reduce pollution. Besides the SOC and rainfall increases, Koc increased from nitisol to ferralsol and then andosol while lixiviation efficiency decreased. Consequently, pollution is bound to last for several decades for nitisol, centuries for ferralsol, and half a millennium for andosol. Soil and water contamination by chlordecone will persist for several centuries in the French West Indies, because the only decontamination is through leaching by drainage water.

La chlordécone, insecticide organochloré, était utilisée pour lutter contre le charançon du bananier (Cosmopolites sordidus) de 1971 à 1993. La chlordécone est peu mobile et se dégrade à une vitesse très lente, voire nulle dans les sols aérés. Sa persistance est donc longue, et la dépollution artificielle n'est pas opérationnelle actuellement. Cependant les sols restent fertiles même si ils constituent la principale réserve et source de pollution. Il faut donc gérer cette pollution. Cela implique des changements au sein des agrosystèmes, tant sur le choix des productions possibles que sur certaines pratiques agronomiques pour réduire les impacts sanitaires. Pour les espèces cultivées sur les parcelles polluées, certains organes sont très contaminés (tubercules), d'autres indemnes (fruits d'arbres, banane, ananas, tomate, etc.). Un outil de gestion est disponible pour les producteurs afin d'anticiper le choix des cultures et de réduire le risque d'exposition des consommateurs. Réciproquement, les systèmes de culture ont une incidence sur la dispersion de la molécule à l'échelle d'une parcelle et d'un bassin versant. La chlordécone contamine les ressources et les organismes aquatiques via les eaux de percolations issues des parcelles polluées. Cet article fait le point sur les principaux résultats disponibles et les projets en cours sur la gestion des agrosystèmes et les processus de transferts de la chlordécone vers l'environnement ainsi que leurs impacts sur les écosystèmes aquatiques. (Résumé d'auteur)

Chlordecone is an organochlorine insecticide and it was used to fight against the banana black weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) from 1971 to 1993 in the French West Indies. Chlordecone is not a mobile molecule and is very slowly or almost not degradable in aerobic soils. Its persistence is a long term one and technical remediation is not operational at this time, but soils stay fertile, even if they remain the main pollution source. Thus we have to face and manage this pollution. This leads to changes among agrosystems, whether on crop choice or on practices to reduce sanitary impact. Chlordecone crop uptake varies according to the type of plant and organ: roots and tubers are highly contaminated whether fruits (banana, pineapple, tomato, citrus, etc.) are chlordecone free. A management tool is now available for farmers to choose crops according to the field pollution level and to reduce the consumers’ exposure risk. Reciprocally, cropping systems have an influence on pollution dispersion at the field and watershed scales. Chlordecone pollutes water resources and aquatic organisms through leaching water from polluted fields. This article present the existing situation and sums up the knowledge available based on results from past and in progress projects on cropping systems management and transfer processes to the environment, as well as on their impacts on aquatic ecosystems. | La chlordécone, insecticide organochloré, était utilisée pour lutter contre le charançon du bananier (Cosmopolites sordidus) de 1971 à 1993. La chlordécone est peu mobile et se dégrade à une vitesse très lente, voire nulle dans les sols aérés. Sa persistance est donc longue, et la dépollution artificielle n'est pas opérationnelle actuellement. Cependant les sols restent fertiles même si ils constituent la principale réserve et source de pollution.[br/] Il faut donc gérer cette pollution. Cela implique des changements au sein des agrosystèmes, tant sur le choix des productions possibles que sur certaines pratiques agronomiques pour réduire les impacts sanitaires. Pour les espèces cultivées sur les parcelles polluées, certains organes sont très contaminés (tubercules), d'autres indemnes (fruits d'arbres, banane, ananas, tomate, etc.). Un outil de gestion est disponible pour les producteurs afin d'anticiper le choix des cultures et de réduire le risque d'exposition des consommateurs. Réciproquement, les systèmes de culture ont une incidence sur la dispersion de la molécule à l'échelle d'une parcelle et d'un bassin versant. La chlordécone contamine les ressources et les organismes aquatiques via les eaux de percolations issues des parcelles polluées. Cet article fait le point sur les principaux résultats disponibles et les projets en cours sur la gestion des agrosystèmes et les processus de transferts de la chlordécone vers l'environnement ainsi que leurs impacts sur les écosystèmes aquatiques.

Chlordecone is an organochlorine insecticide and it was used to fight against the banana black weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) from 1971 to 1993 in the French West Indies. Chlordecone is not a mobile molecule and is very slowly or almost not degradable in aerobic soils. Its persistence is a long term one and technical remediation is not operational at this time, but soils stay fertile, even if they remain the main pollution source. Thus we have to face and manage this pollution. This leads to changes among agrosystems, whether on crop choice or on practices to reduce sanitary impact. Chlordecone crop uptake varies according to the type of plant and organ: roots and tubers are highly contaminated whether fruits (banana, pineapple, tomato, citrus, etc.) are chlordecone free. A management tool is now available for farmers to choose crops according to the field pollution level and to reduce the consumers’ exposure risk. Reciprocally, cropping systems have an influence on pollution dispersion at the field and watershed scales. Chlordecone pollutes water resources and aquatic organisms through leaching water from polluted fields. This article present the existing situation and sums up the knowledge available based on results from past and in progress projects on cropping systems management and transfer processes to the environment, as well as on their impacts on aquatic ecosystems. | La chlordécone, insecticide organochloré, était utilisée pour lutter contre le charançon du bananier (Cosmopolites sordidus) de 1971 à 1993. La chlordécone est peu mobile et se dégrade à une vitesse très lente, voire nulle dans les sols aérés. Sa persistance est donc longue, et la dépollution artificielle n'est pas opérationnelle actuellement. Cependant les sols restent fertiles même si ils constituent la principale réserve et source de pollution.[br/] Il faut donc gérer cette pollution. Cela implique des changements au sein des agrosystèmes, tant sur le choix des productions possibles que sur certaines pratiques agronomiques pour réduire les impacts sanitaires. Pour les espèces cultivées sur les parcelles polluées, certains organes sont très contaminés (tubercules), d'autres indemnes (fruits d'arbres, banane, ananas, tomate, etc.). Un outil de gestion est disponible pour les producteurs afin d'anticiper le choix des cultures et de réduire le risque d'exposition des consommateurs. Réciproquement, les systèmes de culture ont une incidence sur la dispersion de la molécule à l'échelle d'une parcelle et d'un bassin versant. La chlordécone contamine les ressources et les organismes aquatiques via les eaux de percolations issues des parcelles polluées. Cet article fait le point sur les principaux résultats disponibles et les projets en cours sur la gestion des agrosystèmes et les processus de transferts de la chlordécone vers l'environnement ainsi que leurs impacts sur les écosystèmes aquatiques.