Refinar búsqueda
Resultados 1-3 de 3
Carbon balance in forest mineral soils in Latvia modelled with Yasso07 soil carbon model
2017
Bardulis, A., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia) | Lupikis, A., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia) | Stola, J., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia)
Yasso07 soil carbon model was used to estimate soil carbon balance in dry forest site types (6 site types in total) in Latvia and the results were compared with data from Biosoil2012 soil surveys. Litter input, chemical quality and climatic data are required to run the model. Three different scenarios were used for climate data input – steady climate, climate change + 0.025 °C annually and climate change + 0.05 °C annually. Forest mineral soil is a carbon sink for the whole modelled period - the years of 1990 – 2030. Under steady climate, the average carbon removal is 0.6 t CO2 haE-1 yrE-1, under climate change (+ 0.025 °C) scenario 0.4 t CO2 haE-1 yrE-1, but under climate change (+ 0.05 °C) scenario 0.3 t CO2 haE-1 yrE-1. CO2 removal at the beginning of the period (1990) was 0.35 – 0.38 t CO2 haE-1 yrE-1. Carbon stock modelled with Yasso07 is lower than estimated in Biosoil2012 soil surveys. Differences between modelled and Biosoil2012 results vary from 2 t C haE-1 in the poorest and 41 t CO2 haE-1 in the third poorest site type. Carbon stock modelled with Yasso07 increases from the poorest to the most fertile site type while Biosoil2012 shows an increase from the poorest to the third poorest, and a decrease from the third poorest to the most fertile site type. Underestimation and different trends between Yasso07 and measured carbon stock may be explained by inappropriate equations and models used to estimate non-woody biomass. It is necessary to improve accuracy of input data for non-woody biomass by elaborating national equations and models in order to include Yasso07 in the national GHG inventory.
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]Assessment of land use change scenario to increase primary productivity function at local scale
2019
Valujeva, K., Latvia Univ. of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava (Latvia);Wageningen Univ. and Research (Netherlands) | Nipers, A., Latvia Univ. of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava (Latvia) | Lupikis, A., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils, Latvia | Pilecka, J., Latvia Univ. of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava (Latvia) | Schulte, R.P.O., Wageningen Univ. and Research (Netherlands)
The global population has begun to rise exponentially; therefore, the demand for bioresources including food and fibre is increasing. An increasing demand for food and fibre necessitates more sustainable use of natural resources especially for soilbased ecosystem services. In this context, Functional Land Management was developed to optimize agricultural soilbased ecosystem services to meet both agricultural and environmental targets simultaneously. The aim of the research is to evaluate unmanaged agricultural land use change impact on primary productivity function in three parishes in Latvia by using Functional Land Management framework. Evaluation of primary productivity function was accomplished for both sectors agriculture and forestry by using profit and working hours as a proxyindicators. Production of vegetables and perennial plantations has higher supply of primary productivity function comparing to other land uses. Land use changes affect all soil functions that we expect from our land, especially primary productivity function. After applying land use changes, an increase in profit is higher in Liezere parish for both areas on mineral soils (7.1%) and areas on organic soils (5.2%); while an increase in working hours is higher in Usma parish: 36.6% in areas on mineral soils and 1.0% increase in areas on organic soils. Shortterm benefits are received from agricultural land, while forest land provides long-term return which increases over time but can only be obtained after reaching the age of felling. Before applying land use changes or changes in management practices we have to consider other soil function and national commitments.
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]Soil carbon stock in fertilized forest stands with mineral soils
2021
Karklina, I., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia);University of Latvia, Riga (Latvia) | Lazdins, A., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia) | Butlers, A., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia) | Stola, J., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia);University of Latvia, Riga (Latvia) | Zvaigzne, Z.A., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia) | Purvina, D., Latvian State Forest Research Inst. Silava, Salaspils (Latvia)
Forest mineral soil is one of the terrestrial carbon pools, and changes in forest management practices can affect the carbon stock in forest soil. The purpose of the study is to estimate temporal fertilization impact on mineral soil organic carbon stock, depending on fertilizers applied, forest stand type, different dominant tree species of the stands. Coniferous and birch forest stands with mineral soil in the central and eastern part of Latvia were selected for the experiment. The fertilizers used were wood ash and nitrogen containing mineral fertilizer. No significant differences in organic carbon stock in O horizon were detected 2–5 years after fertilization. A tendency of smaller organic carbon stock in upper mineral soil layers (0–10 cm, 10–20 cm) was found in most part of objects. Significantly smaller organic carbon stock was found in upper mineral soil layers (0–10 cm and 10–20 cm) in birch stands with wet mineral soil treated with ammonium nitrate if compared to the control plots, possibly due to a different soil moisture regime of forest stands. The positive and significant correlations between soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks were found in most part of the objects.
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]