Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats
1991
Miller, P.E. | Pickett, J.P. | Majors, L.J. | Kurzman, I.D.
Comparisons of the MacKay-Marg and Tono-Pen applanation tonometers in open and closed in vitro systems were made for the eyes of cats. Both instruments significantly underestimated intraocular pressure (IOP) vs direct manometry (P < 0.001), but in readily predictable manner, with high coefficients of determination (r2 = 0.99). For tonometer 1 (MacKay-Marg), calculated actual IOP = 1.36 X (MacKay-Marg measurement) - 1.67 mm of Hg; and for tonometer 2 (Tono-Pen), calculated actual IOP = 1.37 X (Tono-Pen measurement) + 0.8 mm of Hg, using measurements from 11 enucleated eyes. In vivo comparisons were initially made in 81 clinically normal eyes (n = 41 cats) by applying the Tono-Pen first followed by the MacKay-Marg. Compared with the MacKay-Marg, the Tono-Pen significantly (P < 0.001) underestimated IOP in these cats. When the order of tonometer applanation was subsequently reversed in 73 clinically normal eyes (n = 37 cats) the Tono-pen again significantly (P < 0.001) underestimated IOP, compared with the MacKay-Marg. Alterations in tonometer order did not result in significant differences in measured IOP for the MacKay-Marg when compared with itself, but Tono-Pen measurements were significantly (P < 0.05) less when its use followed rather than preceded, that of the MacKay-Marg. Mean (+/- SD) IOP in clinically normal cats when each tonometer was used first was 22.6 +/- 4.0 mm of Hg (range, 14 to 32 mm of Hg) for the MacKay-Marg and 19.7 +/- 5.6 mm of Hg (9 to 31 mm of Hg) for the Tono-Pen. The mean (+/- SD) absolute value of the differences between MacKay-Marg measurements and those obtained by use of the Tono-Pen was 3.2 +/- 3.1 (range, 0 to 13 mm of Hg difference).
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил National Agricultural Library
