Anthropogenic activities have polluted soil and aquatic ecosystems by introducing harmful heavy metals (HMs) such as cadmium, copper, mercury, lead, manganese, nickel, zinc, and others. These HMs lead to serious health conditions in humans like cancer, skin lesions, birth defects, liver and kidney damage, and mental retardation leading to other disabilities. Conventional methods of HM remediation of contaminated soil and water include physical, chemical, biological, and integrated methods. The use of physical and chemical methods, in isolation, has been reduced in practice, owing to their negative impacts, however, work on suitable integrated approaches, and the use of organisms for HM remediation has been in steady progress since past few decades. These approaches have proved to be eco-friendly, cost-effective, and show reduced negative impacts on the environment and biota. However, there is consistent increase in anthropogenic contribution to this problem, so, to keep pace with it, more recently work is in advancement on exploiting the biological system to increase the efficiency of bioremediation, using the latest technologies such as genetic engineering and nanotechnology. This paper provides an overview of the current methods deployed to address this problem, developments made in this field in past few decades, and evokes a research thrust that might lead to novel remediation approaches in the future.

Textile effluents are highly colored for synthetic dyes, cause significant water pollution due to high pH, TDS, EC, BOD, and COD content, and are harmful to aquatic species. Among different treatment processes, biological treatment process is considered as a promising approach. In this investigation, a mixed aerobic bacterial consortium was used for the treatment of wastewater. In addition, the fenton process with a normal sand filter was used for treatment and compared with the biological method. The mean values of BOD, COD, TDS, EC, DO, and pH in the raw wastewater indicated that the effluent was highly contaminated according to Bangladesh standard (ECR, 1997). Both the biological treatment process and fenton process separately showed promising removal of pollution load. The aerobic mixed bacterial consortium reduced TDS (66.67%), EC (60%), BOD (91.67%), and COD (85.45%) and fenton process reduced TDS (74.71%), EC (55.11%), BOD (88.33%), and COD (83.63%) compared to the raw effluent bacterial consortium simultaneously degraded dyes and decolorized the wastewater from dark deep green to transparent. Color removal for the mixed aerobic bacterial process after 72 hours of aeration was 58.57% and for the fenton process with a normal sand filter was 80%. BOD and COD removal percentages for aerobic mixed bacterial consortium showed higher removal efficiency than the fenton process with a normal sand filter. Though 92 hours of aeration showed the maximum satisfactory result, aeration time could be reduced to 72 hours which also satisfied the Bangladeshi standard (ECR, 1997).