Water rights transfer is significantly required for alleviating the ever-intensive water crisis, particularly for arid watersheds with abundant farmland and fossil fuels. However, focusing solely on the re-allocation of water rights and disregarding agricultural water saving potential imperil the security of Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus. Furthermore, randomness in water availability leads to water shortage risks and subsequent impact on the whole system. In this study, a risk-based optimization model (RWEF) was proposed to promote inter-sectoral water rights transfer through encouraging energy sector to invest in agricultural water-saving works and get paid back in water rights. Chance-constrained programming is incorporated to analyze the trade-offs between system benefits and water-shortage risks. The developed model was applied to the Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River Basin, China to verify its effectiveness, considering different development levels of food and energy industries. Results indicated that 488 million m³ of water could be transformed from agriculture to energy, without compromising agricultural production. The main recipients of transferred water rights would be traditional coal-based industries, while it would be difficult for thermal power and most modern coal chemical industries to participate. The construction of water-saving works would help safeguard agricultural production under risks. Compared against two alternative models without water rights transfer mechanism, the average benefit acquired from RWEF under varied water-shortage risks would be at least 68% higher. Particularly, when confronted with extreme water-shortage risk and increased production demands, RWEF would still be able to support agricultural and energy production, while the alternative models being incapable.

For the 1.5 billion people living in fragile and conflict-affected situations, livelihood challenges are compounded by climate change, unsustainable resource consumption, poor governance, and weak social cohesion. Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and preparedness are critical components of a comprehensive approach to managing and mitigating the impact of disasters. While anticipatory action (AA) interventions for monitoring socio-ecological risks are gaining prominence, the approaches and risk indicators differ considerably within and between climate, development, and humanitarian communities. There is also a fundamental variance in approaches and risk indicators relating to triggers and trigger components. This diversity underscores the need for a cohesive framework which addresses these disparities. Here we define a novel typology of fragility and risk indicators from a food, land and water system perspective, which supports the evolving nature of anticipatory action.

Issues of water scarcity, food crisis, and ecological degradation pose great challenges to the sustainable development of Central Asia. In this study, a bi-level chance-constrained programming (BCCP) method is developed for planning water-food-ecology (WFE) nexus system of the Amu Darya River basin, where the efficiency of water-trading mechanism and the impact of uncertain water-availability are examined. This is the first attempt for planning WFE nexus system by incorporating chance-constrained programming (CCP) within a bi-level optimization framework. BCCP can reflect the risk of violating probabilistic constraint under uncertainty as well as balance the tradeoff between two-level decision makers in the WFE nexus system. Under trading scheme, multiple scenarios in association with different food demand, ecological-water requirement, and water availability are examined. Major findings are: (i) compared with that under non-trading, system benefits would increase [3.9, 20.4]% under trading scenarios, disclosing that water trading is an effective mechanism for the study basin; (ii) when food demand increases 10.5%, water allocated to ecological use would decrease [0.9, 2.7]% under all scenarios, revealing that agriculture can squeeze ecological water; (iii) both system benefit and water allocation would increase with p level, implying there is a tradeoff between system benefit and system-failure risk. These findings can gain insight into the interaction between two-level stakeholders and objectives as well as provide decision support for WFE nexus synergetic management.